子智能体驱动开发

通过为每个任务派发新的子智能体来执行计划，每个任务后进行两阶段审查：先规格符合性审查，再代码质量审查。

核心原则： 每任务一个新子智能体 + 两阶段审查（先规格后质量）= 高质量、快速迭代

开始时宣布：「我正在使用 subagent-driven-development 技能按计划派发子智能体并执行两阶段审查。」

何时使用

digraph when_to_use {
    "Have implementation plan?" [shape=diamond];
    "Tasks mostly independent?" [shape=diamond];
    "Stay in this session?" [shape=diamond];
    "subagent-driven-development" [shape=box];
    "executing-plans" [shape=box];
    "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [shape=box];

    "Have implementation plan?" -> "Tasks mostly independent?" [label="yes"];
    "Have implementation plan?" -> "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [label="no"];
    "Tasks mostly independent?" -> "Stay in this session?" [label="yes"];
    "Tasks mostly independent?" -> "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [label="no - tightly coupled"];
    "Stay in this session?" -> "subagent-driven-development" [label="yes"];
    "Stay in this session?" -> "executing-plans" [label="no - parallel session"];
}

与 Executing Plans（并行会话）相比：

• 同一会话（无上下文切换）
• 每任务一个新子智能体（无上下文污染）
• 每任务后两阶段审查：先规格符合性，再代码质量
• 更快迭代（任务间无人为介入）

流程

digraph process {
    rankdir=TB;

    subgraph cluster_per_task {
        label="Per Task";
        "Dispatch implementer subagent (./references/implementer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
        "Implementer subagent asks questions?" [shape=diamond];
        "Answer questions, provide context" [shape=box];
        "Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" [shape=box];
        "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./references/spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
        "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" [shape=diamond];
        "Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" [shape=box];
        "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./references/code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
        "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" [shape=diamond];
        "Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" [shape=box];
        "Mark task complete in TodoWrite" [shape=box];
    }

    "Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite" [shape=box];
    "More tasks remain?" [shape=diamond];
    "Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" [shape=box];
    "Use superpowers:finishing-development" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen];

    "Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./references/implementer-prompt.md)";
    "Dispatch implementer subagent (./references/implementer-prompt.md)" -> "Implementer subagent asks questions?";
    "Implementer subagent asks questions?" -> "Answer questions, provide context" [label="yes"];
    "Answer questions, provide context" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./references/implementer-prompt.md)";
    "Implementer subagent asks questions?" -> "Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" [label="no"];
    "Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" -> "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./references/spec-reviewer-prompt.md)";
    "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./references/spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" -> "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?";
    "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" -> "Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" [label="no"];
    "Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" -> "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./references/spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="re-review"];
    "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" -> "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./references/code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="yes"];
    "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./references/code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" -> "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?";
    "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" -> "Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" [label="no"];
    "Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" -> "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./references/code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="re-review"];
    "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" -> "Mark task complete in TodoWrite" [label="yes"];
    "Mark task complete in TodoWrite" -> "More tasks remain?";
    "More tasks remain?" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./references/implementer-prompt.md)" [label="yes"];
    "More tasks remain?" -> "Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" [label="no"];
    "Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" -> "Use finishing-development";
}

提示模板

• references/implementer-prompt.md – 派发实施者子智能体
• references/spec-reviewer-prompt.md – 派发规格符合性审查者子智能体
• references/code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md – 派发代码质量审查者子智能体

优势

与手动执行相比：

• 子智能体自然遵循 TDD
• 每任务新上下文（无混淆）
• 并行安全（子智能体互不干扰）
• 子智能体可提问（工作前后及期间）

与 Executing Plans 相比：

• 同一会话（无交接）
• 连续进展（无等待）
• 自动审查检查点

效率提升：

• 无文件读取开销（控制器提供全文）
• 控制器只提供所需上下文
• 子智能体预先获得完整信息
• 工作开始前暴露问题（而非之后）

质量门槛：

• 自审在交接前发现问题
• 两阶段审查：规格符合性，再代码质量
• 审查循环确保修复有效
• 规格符合性防止过度/不足实现
• 代码质量确保实现良好

红旗

绝不：

• 未经用户明确同意在 main/master 分支上开始实施
• 跳过审查（规格符合性或代码质量）
• 带着未修复问题继续
• 并行派发多个实施子智能体（会冲突）
• 让子智能体读取计划文件（改为提供全文）
• 跳过背景设定（子智能体需理解任务所处位置）
• 忽视子智能体问题（在让其继续前回答）
• 在规格符合性上接受「差不多」（规格审查发现问题 = 未完成）
• 跳过审查循环（审查者发现问题 = 实施者修复 = 再次审查）
• 用实施者自审替代实际审查（二者都需要）
• 在规格符合性 ✅ 之前开始代码质量审查（顺序错误）
• 任一审查有未解决问题时进入下一任务

若子智能体提问：

• 清晰完整地回答
• 必要时提供额外上下文
• 不要催促其进入实施

若审查者发现问题：

• 实施者（同一子智能体）修复
• 审查者再次审查
• 重复直至通过
• 不要跳过再次审查

若子智能体任务失败：

• 派发修复子智能体并给出具体指令
• 不要手动修复（会导致上下文污染）

集成

必需工作流技能：

• spec-init – 必需：开始前设置隔离工作区
• spec-implementation-plan – 创建本技能所执行的计划
• requesting-code-review – 审查者子智能体的代码审查模板
• finishing-development – 所有任务完成后做开发收尾确认

子智能体应使用：

• test-driven-development – 子智能体对每任务遵循 TDD

替代工作流：

• spec-implementation-execute – 用于并行会话而非同会话执行