Content Digest

Transform long-form content into compelling short-form and long-form narratives.

Overview

This skill converts lengthy content (YouTube videos, podcasts, interviews, articles) into two distinct formats:

1. Short-Form (短文): Social media-friendly summaries (300-800 characters) with numbered emoji lists (1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣)
2. Long-Form (长文): Narrative articles (1500-3000+ characters) with story arcs, section headers, and integrated quotes

Workflow

1. Obtain the Content

If user provides a URL:

• YouTube links: Use WebFetch or attempt to extract transcript
• Article URLs: Use WebFetch to retrieve content
• Podcast links: Fetch transcript if available

If user provides text:

• Read the full transcript or article text directly

If content is unclear:

• Ask: “Please provide the YouTube link, podcast transcript, or article you’d like me to transform.”

2. Determine Output Format

If user specifies format:

• Proceed with their choice (short-form only, long-form only, or both)

If user does not specify:

• Ask: “Would you like: (1) Short-form only, (2) Long-form only, or (3) Both versions?”

Default behavior:

• Generate both versions to maximize value

3. Deep Analysis – Four-Stage Process

CRITICAL: Follow this systematic process to ensure depth

Stage 1: Extract All Viewpoints (50+ minimum)

Read the entire content thoroughly and extract ALL viewpoints, including:

• Explicit statements and opinions
• Implicit beliefs revealed through stories
• Decision-making rationales
• Observations about the industry/domain
• Personal experiences and lessons
• Counterexamples and contrasts
• Numbers, data points, specific examples

Goal: Create a comprehensive list of 50+ viewpoints before filtering. Don’t judge quality yet – just extract everything.

Stage 2: Filter for Non-Consensus & Depth

From the 50+ viewpoints, identify and mark those that are:

• Non-consensus (非共识): Challenges industry conventional wisdom
• Personal/private insights (个人私下表达): Things people think but rarely say publicly
• Counterintuitive (反直觉): Surprises even informed readers
• Interesting trivia (有意思的冷知识): Specific details that reveal deeper patterns
• Mental models: Frameworks that explain decision-making
• Second-order insights: Not just “what” but “why this matters philosophically”
• Paradoxes and tensions: Contradictions that expose underlying principles

Goal: Flag the 20-30 viewpoints that pass the “non-obvious test” – would a smart, informed reader already know this?

Stage 3: Select Core Narrative Elements

Identify:

• Core narrative: What’s the main story or theme?
• Memorable quotes: Direct quotes that capture big ideas or reveal character
• Turning points: Moments of realization or paradigm shifts
• Dramatic elements: Irony, contrast, or unexpected outcomes
• Specific details: Names, numbers, dates that prove the deeper point

Stage 4: Curate Final Insights

From the filtered viewpoints (Stage 2) and narrative elements (Stage 3):

• For short-form: Select 10-15 most profound, actionable insights
• For long-form: Use the same 10-15 insights as the foundation, then weave in narrative arc

4. Generate Short-Form Version

CRITICAL: Use ONLY the 10-15 curated insights from Stage 4

Consult style-guide.md for detailed guidelines. See examples.md for reference.

Structure:

# MMDD：[嘉宾名] X [栏目名]：[一句话核心观点]

今天看到 [嘉宾名] 去了 [栏目名] 的播客。

[嘉宾名] [2-3句话介绍嘉宾背景和核心成就，用具体数据]。

这期播客总共录了 [时长]，[嘉宾名] 谈到了 [N] 个有趣的观点：

1、[观点标题/关键词]。[完整的逻辑阐述，包含推理过程，2-4句话]

2、[观点标题/关键词]。[完整的逻辑阐述，包含推理过程，2-4句话]

3、[观点标题/关键词]。[完整的逻辑阐述，包含推理过程，2-4句话]

...
[Continue with 10-15 total points]

---

标题格式 (重要):

• 格式：# MMDD：嘉宾名 X 栏目名：一句话观点
• 示例：# 0130：Peter Steinberger X The Pragmatic Engineer：一天600次提交，代码比以前更好
• 一句话观点要抓住最反直觉或最有冲击力的点

开头格式 (重要):

• 第一句：简单说看了什么 今天看到 [嘉宾] 去了 [栏目] 的播客。
• 第二段：2-3句介绍嘉宾背景，必须有具体数据（数字、公司名、产品名）
• 第三句：过渡句 这期播客总共录了 [时长]，[嘉宾] 谈到了 [N] 个有趣的观点：
• 如果不知道时长，可以写”将近两小时”或省略时长

List Format Rules (重要):

• 使用数字+顿号格式 (1、 2、 3、…)
  • 注意是顿号「、」不是点号「.」
• 每条是完整段落，包含：
  • 观点/结论（第一句）
  • 逻辑推理/因果解释（后续句子）
  • 具体例子或数据（如有）
• 每条 2-4 句话，50-150 字
• 观点要有深度：
  • ✅ “AI 应用创业者不会相信 AGI。逻辑很简单，如果真信，就不应该做 AI 应用创业。AGI 如果存在，创业就只剩一件事：去做有机会达成 AGI 的模型。”
  • ❌ “AI 应用创业者不相信 AGI”（太简单，没有逻辑推理）
• 保持 10-15 条（不是 8-12 条）

Key principles:

• 标题要有冲击力，抓住最反直觉的观点
• 开头简洁，快速进入正题
• 每条观点要有完整的逻辑链条
• 观点之间可以有递进或对比关系
• Include specific data when available (numbers, names, percentages)
• Pass the non-obvious test (would informed readers NOT already know this?)
• End with separator line ---

5. Generate Long-Form Version

CRITICAL: Build ENTIRELY on the same 10-15 curated insights from Stage 4

The long-form version is NOT a separate summary – it’s a narrative expansion of the SHORT-form insights with story arc and analytical depth.

Consult style-guide.md for detailed guidelines. See examples.md for reference.

IMPORTANT: Choose the right style based on content type

For interview/podcast/dialogue content → Use Style B (对话式访谈) For solo speech/article/essay → Use Style A (叙事性文章)

Style A Structure (叙事性文章):

[Compelling Title - derived from core insight]

[Opening: Set the scene using one of the 10-15 insights]

### [Section 1: Background]
"[Key quote]"
[Context - connect to 2-3 of your curated insights]

### [Section 2: Main Content]
[Narrative development - weave in 4-5 curated insights with quotes and analysis]

### [Section 3: Climax]
[Dramatic highlights - reveal most counterintuitive insight]

### [Section 4: Resolution/Turning Point]
"[Pivotal quote]"
[Significance - tie back to mental model or principle]

### [Epilogue: Reflection]
[What happened after / Ironic contrast - connect final insights]

[Optional: Source attribution]

Key principles (Style A):

• Compelling title derived from your deepest insight
• Clear section headers for navigation
• Each section develops 2-4 of your 10-15 curated insights with narrative and quotes
• Integrate direct quotes naturally – use them to prove your curated insights
• Build narrative arc: setup → development → climax → resolution
• Use dramatic irony when relevant (“他不知道的是…” / “He didn’t know that…”)
• Include specific details (names, numbers, dates) from your curated list
• Deep analytical layer – weave in your Stage 2 filtered insights:
  • Why specific choices reveal broader strategic principles
  • How contradictions or tensions expose underlying philosophies
  • What the subject’s evolution teaches about the domain
  • Connections between micro-decisions and macro-outcomes
• 2000-3500+ characters to properly develop 10-15 deep insights

Style B Structure (对话式访谈):

[前言/导语 - 编辑者视角]
断断续续，终于看完了...[个人感受]
干货很多。[嘉宾]可能是...[定位评价]
[为什么值得关注]
我今天不忙，把这次访谈全文精编出来，供大家学习。赠人玫瑰，手有余香。
[可选：节日祝福]
下面是 YouTube/播客链接：[链接]

#01 [主题标题 - 简短有力]
主持人：[问题]
嘉宾：[回答 - 保留对话感]

[编辑补充：数据解读、背景、个人观点]
[可用："我觉得这个点真的太重要了" "这太有意思了"]

主持人：[追问]
嘉宾：[深入回答]

[继续分析]
[可选：插入相关文章链接]

#02 [第二主题]
主持人：[新话题]
嘉宾：[回答]

[编辑解读]
...

#03-#0N [按主题继续]
...

Key principles (Style B):

• 口语化开场：”断断续续看完” “干货很多” 体现真实感
• 编号主题：用 #01 #02 等清晰分段，主题标题直白有力
• 保留对话：60-70%保持”主持人：””嘉宾：”格式
• 编辑介入：20-30%加入编辑分析、补充、个人反应
• 口语化表达：”太离谱了” “我觉得” “说实话” “天哪” “完全是这样”
• 具体数据：必须保留数字、人名、公司名
• 补充链接：适时插入”文章链接：…” 延伸阅读
• 人情味结尾：”赠人玫瑰，手有余香”
• 主题重组：不按时间线，按话题逻辑重新组织
• 3000-8000+ 字（根据访谈长度）

6. Quality Check

Before delivering, verify you followed the four-stage process:

Stage 1 verification:

• Extracted 50+ viewpoints from source material (can be implicit – doesn’t need to be shown to user)

Stage 2 verification:

• Filtered for non-consensus, counterintuitive, and deep insights
• Identified personal/private expressions and interesting trivia
• Marked mental models and second-order insights

Stage 3 & 4 verification:

• Selected 10-15 most profound insights for final output
• Short version uses ALL 10-15 curated insights
• Long version develops the SAME 10-15 insights with narrative

Depth check – Each of the 10-15 insights must:

• Pass the “non-obvious test”: Would an informed reader already know this?
• Reveal a mental model, framework, or underlying principle
• Challenge conventional thinking OR expose interesting trivia
• Connect ideas in an unexpected way OR show second-order effects

Quality verification:

• Quotes are accurate and attributed
• No editorializing beyond source material
• Writing is engaging, not robotic
• Both versions can stand alone
• Numbers/facts are specific, not vague
• The “so what?” is clear to readers
• Every takeaway reveals WHY it matters, not just WHAT happened
• Short and long versions share the same insight foundation

7. Deliver Output

文件保存规范：

• 保存位置：/Users/ugreen/Documents/obsidian/每日播客/
• 文件命名：MMDD-主题关键词.md
  • MMDD 为当天日期（如 0109 表示 1 月 9 日）
  • 主题关键词 为 2-6 个字的内容概括（如 Lovable增长策略、AI编程工具）
  • 示例：0109-Lovable增长策略.md、0108-睡眠科学.md
• 自动保存：生成内容后，使用 Write 工具将完整内容保存到上述路径

格式规范：

• 行距：段落内不留空行，段落之间留一个空行
• 文档标题：使用 # MMDD：嘉宾名 X 栏目名：一句话观点 格式
• 长文标题：使用 # 精华片段

结构模板：

# MMDD：[嘉宾名] X [栏目名]：[一句话核心观点]

今天看到 [嘉宾名] 去了 [栏目名] 的播客。

[嘉宾名] [2-3句话介绍嘉宾背景，用具体数据]。

这期播客总共录了 [时长]，[嘉宾名] 谈到了 [N] 个有趣的观点：

1、[观点]。[逻辑推理]

2、[观点]。[逻辑推理]

...（共 10-15 条）

---

# 精华片段

[长文内容 - Style B 对话式访谈格式]

---

[结束语]

开场介绍模板（新格式）：

# 0130：Peter Steinberger X The Pragmatic Engineer：一天600次提交，代码比以前更好

今天看到 Peter Steinberger 去了 The Pragmatic Engineer 的播客。

Peter Steinberger 创建了 PSPDF kit——一个被超过 10 亿设备使用的 PDF 框架，后来经历严重职业倦怠卖掉股份消失了 3 年。2024 年回归后，他用完全不同的方式创建了 Clawdbot，一周从 100 星涨到 3300 星。

这期播客总共录了将近两小时，Peter 谈到了 11 个有趣的观点：

观点列表示例：

1、AI 应用创业者不会相信 AGI。逻辑很简单，如果真信，就不应该做 AI 应用创业。AGI 如果存在，创业就只剩一件事：去做有机会达成 AGI 的模型。

2、创业的产品定位，关键点之一是：要做工作流的上游。上游的产品，不容易被下游的产品吃掉，反过来，发展到一定阶段，上游可以做下游的事。

3、Code Reviews 已死。对 prompts 的兴趣比代码更大，PR 应该叫"Prompt Requests"。因为 prompt 给的信号更高——你是怎么得到这个解决方案的？问了什么？有多少引导？

结束语模板：

---

[嘉宾名字]凭[具体贡献]，[产生的影响]。

用他的话收个尾："[引用一句有力的话]"。[最后一句个人感受或升华]。

YouTube 链接：[链接]

If only one format was requested, still include opening and closing sections.

Core Principles

Extract Strategically

What to extract:

• Deep, counterintuitive insights – not surface observations:
  • Mental models and frameworks that drive decision-making
  • Paradoxes and tensions that reveal underlying principles
  • Second-order effects and non-obvious consequences
  • Patterns that connect specific tactics to strategic outcomes
• Surprising insights that challenge common wisdom
• Practical wisdom with WHY – not just “do X” but “X reveals principle Y”
• Memorable quotes capturing big ideas or philosophical stances
• Turning points and paradigm shifts
• Human moments (vulnerability, humor, authenticity) that reveal character
• Contextual ironies (what they didn’t know then vs. now)

What to avoid:

• Linear summarization without insight
• Including everything (be selective)
• Stating the obvious – if a reasonably informed reader would already know it, dig deeper
• Surface-level descriptions without explaining WHY it matters
• Losing the human voice
• Adding information not in source
• AI-style generic phrasing
• Shallow takeaways – “X did Y” without revealing what principle or framework this demonstrates

Voice & Tone

• Conversational but insightful: Like explaining to a smart friend
• Show, don’t tell: Use quotes to prove points
• Respect the source: Don’t editorialize or distort
• Find the story: Every piece has a narrative arc

Be Token-Efficient

This skill focuses on creative transformation, not code execution. The writing process happens in-context without requiring scripts.

Resources

references/style-guide.md

Detailed writing guidelines for both short-form and long-form styles, including:

• Structure patterns
• Key characteristics
• Writing principles
• What to avoid
• Extraction strategies

Load this when you need detailed guidance on tone, structure, or style.

references/examples.md

Complete reference examples:

• Short-form example: Boris Cherny’s Claude Code workflow
• Long-form example: Manus/Peak Ji interview article

Load this when you need concrete examples of the final output quality and style.

Notes

• Both styles require full comprehension of source material – don’t skim
• Short-form emphasizes actionable takeaways
• Long-form emphasizes narrative and character
• Quotes must be accurate and in context
• Works best with content that has inherent narrative or insight
• Can combine with translation if source is in different language
• Ideal for content creators repurposing long content for different platforms