solidity-code-review
npx skills add https://github.com/whackur/solidity-agent-toolkit --skill solidity-code-review
Agent 安装分布
Skill 文档
Solidity Code Review Guide
When to Apply
Apply this methodology when performing a security audit, peer review, or general assessment of Solidity smart contracts. It is designed to identify vulnerabilities, ensure adherence to best practices, and verify the robustness of the contract logic.
Pre-Review Checklist
Before beginning the manual review, ensure the following items are addressed:
- Compilation: Verify the code compiles without errors using the project’s build system (Foundry, Hardhat, etc.).
- Test Suite: Run the existing test suite. Ensure tests pass and review coverage reports to identify untested logic.
- Dependencies: Identify all external libraries and inherited contracts. Verify versions are pinned and trusted.
- Documentation: Review technical specifications and NatSpec comments to understand intended behavior.
- Known Issues: Check for previous audit reports or documented “known risks” provided by the developers.
- Scope: Define the exact list of contracts and functions that are within the audit scope.
Review Methodology
- Step 1: Scope & Architecture: Map out the contract inheritance, external dependencies, and system architecture.
- Step 2: Manual Line-by-Line Review: Perform a deep dive into critical functions, focusing on state changes and value transfers.
- Step 3: Automated Analysis: Run static analysis tools (Slither, Aderyn, Solhint) to catch common patterns and style violations.
- Step 4: Vulnerability Pattern Matching: Specifically check for known SCWE patterns (Reentrancy, Access Control, etc.).
- Step 5: Integration & Edge Cases: Analyze how contracts interact and test boundary conditions (e.g., zero values, max integers).
Severity Classification
| Severity | Criteria | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Direct loss of funds, permanent contract lock, or total compromise. | Reentrancy, Unprotected withdraw, Logic error in transfer. |
| High | Significant impact on system functionality or exploitable under realistic conditions. | Access control bypass, Unchecked external calls, Oracle manipulation. |
| Medium | Limited impact or requires specific, difficult-to-achieve conditions. | Timestamp dependence, Front-running, Denial of Service (DoS). |
| Low | Best practice violations, informational findings, or minor optimizations. | Missing events, Floating pragma, Unused variables. |
Key Inspection Areas
Access Control & Authorization
- Verify
onlyOwneror role-based access on all sensitive state-changing functions. - Ensure initializers are protected and can only be called once.
- Check for
tx.originusage instead ofmsg.sender.
External Call Safety
- Follow the Check-Effects-Interactions (CEI) pattern strictly.
- Use
call()instead oftransfer()orsend()for ETH transfers. - Handle return values of all external calls.
State Management & Reentrancy
- Use
ReentrancyGuardfor functions making external calls. - Check for cross-contract reentrancy where state is shared.
- Ensure state variables are updated before external interactions.
Arithmetic & Type Safety
- For Solidity <0.8.0, ensure
SafeMathis used. - Check for precision loss in divisions (multiply before dividing).
- Verify safe casting between types (e.g.,
uint256touint8).
Token Handling (ERC20/721)
- Use
SafeERC20fortransferandtransferFrom. - Account for “fee-on-transfer” tokens if applicable.
- Verify
approverace condition handling.
Upgrade Mechanisms
- Check for storage gaps in logic contracts to prevent collisions.
- Ensure logic contracts do not use
selfdestructordelegatecall. - Verify the proxy admin has restricted access.
Event Emissions
- Emit events for all significant state changes (ownership, parameters, transfers).
- Use
indexedparameters for efficient off-chain filtering.
NatSpec Documentation
- Ensure
@notice,@param, and@returnare accurate. - Use
@devto document complex logic or security assumptions.
Style Guide Compliance
- Code follows the official Solidity style guide conventions.
- Naming conventions: PascalCase (contracts), camelCase (functions), UPPER_CASE (constants).
- Function ordering: by visibility (external â public â internal â private), then by mutability (state-changing â view â pure) within each group.
- Function modifier order: visibility, mutability, virtual, override, custom.
- See the Solidity Style Guide Reference for the full checklist.
Reporting Format
Findings should be documented using the following template:
[SEVERITY] Finding Title
ID: SCWE-XXX (replace with actual SCWE ID, e.g., SCWE-046 â see search_vulnerabilities)
Location: ContractName.sol:L42
Description: Detailed explanation of the vulnerability and how it can be triggered.
Impact: What happens if this is exploited (e.g., “User funds can be stolen”).
Remediation: Specific code changes or architectural adjustments to fix the issue.
Enhanced with MCP
When using the solidity-agent-toolkit, leverage these tools in a structured review workflow:
Step 1 â Static Analysis:
run_slitherâ Comprehensive static analysis with SCWE-mapped findingsrun_aderynâ Fast Rust-based vulnerability scannerrun_solhintâ Linting and style enforcement
Step 2 â Pattern Detection:
match_vulnerability_patternsâ Regex-based detection of 32+ common vulnerability patterns
Step 3 â Vulnerability Lookup:
search_vulnerabilitiesâ Search the OWASP SCWE database by keywordget_remediationâ Get specific fix guidance with code examples for any SCWE IDcheck_vulnerabilityâ Check if code matches a known SCWE pattern
Step 4 â Style & Quality:
check_styleâ Automated Solidity style guide compliance (12 rules)format_codeâ Auto-format Solidity codevalidate_natspecâ Verify NatSpec documentation completeness
Step 5 â Full Audit:
- Use the
security_auditprompt for a structured, guided audit process - Use the
code_reviewprompt for comprehensive code quality assessment