governing-law-general

📁 scholarly360/contract-intelligence 📅 7 days ago
2
总安装量
2
周安装量
#66149
全站排名
安装命令
npx skills add https://github.com/scholarly360/contract-intelligence --skill governing-law-general

Agent 安装分布

amp 2
gemini-cli 2
github-copilot 2
codex 2
kimi-cli 2
cursor 2

Skill 文档

Governing Law Clause — General

This skill provides expert-level analysis and drafting assistance for Governing Law clauses in General contracts.


When to Activate

Activate this skill when the user:

  • Uploads or pastes a contract containing a Governing Law clause
  • Asks to draft, redline, or improve a Governing Law clause
  • Asks for a risk assessment of an existing Governing Law provision
  • Mentions keywords: governing law, choice of law, jurisdiction clause

Workflow

Step 1 — Intake

Ask the user (if not already provided):

  1. Which party are you representing? (e.g., vendor, client, buyer, seller)
  2. Jurisdiction governing the contract? (e.g., New York, California, England & Wales)
  3. Is this a draft for review or should I generate fresh language?

Step 2 — Analysis

If reviewing existing language, output the following structure:

## Governing Law Clause Analysis

### Plain-Language Summary
[2-3 sentence plain-English description of what the clause does]

### Key Provisions Identified
- [Provision 1]
- [Provision 2]

### Risk Assessment
| Item | Risk Level | Notes |
|------|-----------|-------|
| [item] | High / Medium / Low | [explanation] |

### Recommended Redlines
[Specific suggested changes with rationale]

### Market Standard Comparison
[How this clause compares to typical General market standard]

Step 3 — Drafting

If generating new language, produce:

  1. Balanced version (neither party-favored)
  2. Favorable to client version
  3. Negotiation notes — what the other side will likely push back on

Governing Law Playbook — General

See scripts/playbook.md for detailed clause-specific guidance, fallback positions, jurisdiction-specific notes, and precedent language.


Important Notes

  • Always caveat that output is not legal advice and should be reviewed by qualified counsel.
  • Flag any provisions that may be unenforceable or jurisdiction-specific.
  • When jurisdiction is unknown, apply general common-law principles and note assumptions.