curriculum-review-accessibility

📁 pauljbernard/content 📅 Jan 24, 2026
10
总安装量
8
周安装量
#29443
全站排名
安装命令
npx skills add https://github.com/pauljbernard/content --skill curriculum-review-accessibility

Agent 安装分布

claude-code 6
antigravity 4
codex 4
gemini-cli 4
windsurf 3

Skill 文档

Accessibility Validation & UDL Compliance

Ensure all curriculum materials meet accessibility standards and implement Universal Design for Learning principles for all learners.

When to Use

  • Validate WCAG 2.1 compliance
  • Check UDL implementation
  • Test screen reader compatibility
  • Verify keyboard navigation
  • Ensure accessible formats

Required Inputs

  • Materials: Digital content, documents, multimedia
  • Standards: WCAG 2.1 Level (A, AA, AAA)
  • Platform: Web, PDF, LMS, etc.

Workflow

1. WCAG 2.1 Compliance Check

Perceivable: ✅ Text alternatives for non-text content ✅ Captions and transcripts for multimedia ✅ Content can be presented in different ways ✅ Sufficient color contrast (4.5:1 minimum) ✅ Text can be resized to 200%

Operable: ✅ All functionality available via keyboard ✅ Enough time to read and interact ✅ No content that causes seizures (flashing) ✅ Navigation is clear and consistent ✅ Input purposes identified

Understandable: ✅ Text is readable and predictable ✅ Pages appear and operate predictably ✅ Input assistance for errors ✅ Labels and instructions provided

Robust: ✅ Compatible with assistive technologies ✅ Proper markup and semantics ✅ Name, role, value for all components

2. UDL Principles Assessment

Multiple Means of Representation:

  • ✅ Visual AND textual information
  • ✅ Audio descriptions available
  • ✅ Content in multiple formats
  • ✅ Key vocabulary defined
  • ✅ Background knowledge activated

Multiple Means of Engagement:

  • ✅ Student choice opportunities
  • ✅ Relevance and authenticity
  • ✅ Appropriate challenge level
  • ✅ Collaboration options
  • ✅ Self-reflection prompts

Multiple Means of Expression:

  • ✅ Multiple assessment formats
  • ✅ Varied response options
  • ✅ Scaffolds for practice
  • ✅ Tools and supports available
  • ✅ Progress monitoring

3. Generate Accessibility Report

# Accessibility Review: [TOPIC]

**Review Date**: [Date]
**Standards**: WCAG 2.1 Level AA, UDL
**Materials**: [List]

## Compliance Status

**WCAG 2.1**: [Pass/Fail] - [X/Y criteria met]
**UDL Principles**: [Excellent/Good/Fair/Poor]
**Overall**: [Ready/Needs Revision]

## WCAG Issues Found

### Critical (Level A) - Must Fix
1. [Location]: Missing alt text for diagram
   - **Impact**: Screen reader users cannot access content
   - **Fix**: Add descriptive alt text: "[description]"

### Important (Level AA) - Should Fix
1. [Location]: Color contrast 3.2:1 (needs 4.5:1)
   - **Impact**: Low vision users struggle to read
   - **Fix**: Darken text or lighten background

### Enhancement (Level AAA) - Nice to Have
1. [Location]: No sign language interpretation
   - **Impact**: Deaf users who prefer sign language
   - **Fix**: Consider adding sign language video

## Document Accessibility

**PDF Review**:
- ❌ Headings not tagged
- ❌ Reading order incorrect
- ✅ Searchable text
- ❌ Form fields unlabeled

**Fixes Needed**:
1. Tag all headings with proper levels
2. Fix reading order in Acrobat
3. Add labels to form fields

## Multimedia Accessibility

**Videos**:
- ❌ No captions
- ❌ No transcript
- ❌ No audio description

**Fixes**: Add captions, transcripts, audio descriptions

## UDL Implementation

### Representation (Why)
✅ **Strengths**:
- Multiple formats provided (text, video, diagrams)
- Vocabulary defined
⚠️  **Gaps**:
- No audio version of readings
- Limited visual alternatives

### Engagement (How)
⚠️  **Strengths**:
- Some choice in topics
✅ **Gaps**:
- Limited collaboration options
- No self-regulation scaffolds

### Expression (What)
⚠️  **Strengths**:
- Two assessment format options
❌ **Gaps**:
- No assistive technology support
- Limited scaffolding tools

## Keyboard Navigation
- ✅ All buttons keyboard accessible
- ❌ Skip navigation link missing
- ❌ Focus indicators insufficient

## Screen Reader Testing
- ⚠️  Mostly compatible
- ❌ Some tables not properly structured
- ❌ Links not descriptive ("click here")

## Recommendations

### Priority 1 (Legal Compliance)
1. Add alt text to all images
2. Provide captions for videos
3. Fix color contrast issues
4. Tag PDF headings

### Priority 2 (UDL Implementation)
1. Offer audio versions of text
2. Add student choice opportunities
3. Provide multiple expression formats
4. Include collaboration options

### Priority 3 (Enhancement)
1. Add audio descriptions
2. Provide sign language
3. Enhance keyboard navigation

---

**Artifact Metadata**:
- **WCAG Compliance**: [Level]
- **UDL Rating**: [Score]
- **Critical Issues**: [Count]
- **Ready**: [Yes/No]

4. CLI Interface

# Full accessibility review
/curriculum.review-accessibility --materials "curriculum-artifacts/" --standard "WCAG2.1-AA"

# PDF-specific
/curriculum.review-accessibility --pdf "student-handout.pdf"

# UDL focus
/curriculum.review-accessibility --focus "udl" --lessons "lessons/*.md"

# Help
/curriculum.review-accessibility --help

Exit Codes

  • 0: Fully compliant
  • 1: Issues found
  • 2: Cannot load materials
  • 3: Critical accessibility barriers