stack-feedback

📁 outfitter-dev/agents 📅 Jan 29, 2026
1
总安装量
1
周安装量
#47859
全站排名
安装命令
npx skills add https://github.com/outfitter-dev/agents --skill stack-feedback

Agent 安装分布

github-copilot 1

Skill 文档

Stack Feedback

Create GitHub issues on outfitter-dev/outfitter for problems discovered while using the stack.

When to Use

Invoke this skill when you discover:

  • Bugs in @outfitter/* packages
  • Missing features that would improve DX
  • Unclear documentation that caused confusion
  • Pattern gaps where guidance is missing
  • Ergonomic issues that made tasks harder than expected

Issue Categories

Category Label Example
bug bug Package throws when it should return Result
enhancement feature Add helper for common pattern
docs documentation Handler contract docs missing edge case
unclear-pattern question How to handle X scenario with Result types
dx dx Error message unclear, hard to debug
migration-pattern adoption Migration scenario lacks guidance
conversion-helper adoption Need utility for legacy conversion
compatibility adoption Breaking change concern
migration-docs migration, documentation Migration docs gap

Using the Helper Script

The preferred method for creating issues. The script handles templates, labels, and validation.

Basic Usage

bun plugins/outfitter-stack/skills/stack-feedback/scripts/create-issue.ts \
  --type bug \
  --title "Result.unwrap throws on valid input" \
  --package "@outfitter/contracts" \
  --description "When calling unwrap on Ok value, it unexpectedly throws" \
  --actual "Throws TypeError instead of returning value"

Dry-Run Mode (Default)

By default, the script outputs JSON with the gh command without executing it:

{
  "command": "gh issue create --repo outfitter-dev/outfitter --title '[Bug] Result.unwrap throws...' --label bug --label feedback --label source/agent --body '...'",
  "title": "[Bug] Result.unwrap throws on valid input",
  "labels": ["bug", "feedback", "source/agent"],
  "body": "## Package\n\n`@outfitter/contracts`\n..."
}

Origin Detection

The script automatically detects the git origin of the current directory and adds a “Discovered In” section to the issue body with a link to the source repo. This helps track where feedback originates.

Submit Mode

Add --submit to actually create the issue:

bun plugins/outfitter-stack/skills/stack-feedback/scripts/create-issue.ts \
  --type enhancement \
  --title "Add Result.tap helper" \
  --package "@outfitter/contracts" \
  --description "Helper to run side effects without unwrapping" \
  --useCase "Logging without breaking method chains" \
  --submit

View Template Requirements

Run with just --type to see required and optional fields:

bun plugins/outfitter-stack/skills/stack-feedback/scripts/create-issue.ts --type bug

Available Types

Type Required Fields
bug package, description, actual
enhancement package, description, useCase
docs package, description, gap
unclear-pattern package, description, context
dx package, description, current
migration-pattern sourcePattern, description, scenario
conversion-helper legacyPattern, description, targetPattern
compatibility package, description, breakingChange
migration-docs area, description, gap

Manual Issue Creation

For cases where the script doesn’t fit, use gh directly:

gh issue create \
  --repo outfitter-dev/outfitter \
  --title "[Bug] Brief description" \
  --label "bug" \
  --label "feedback" \
  --label "source/agent" \
  --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Package

`@outfitter/package-name`

## Description

What went wrong or what's missing.

## Actual Behavior

What actually happens.

---

*Created via `outfitter-stack:stack-feedback` skill*
EOF
)"

Tracking Feedback

After creating, track in your project:

## Stack Feedback

- [ ] #123: Result.unwrap throws on valid input — bug

Check Existing Issues

Before creating a new issue, check if it already exists:

gh issue list --repo outfitter-dev/outfitter --label feedback
gh issue list --repo outfitter-dev/outfitter --search "{{KEYWORDS}}"

Batch Feedback

If multiple issues have accumulated:

  1. Review all feedback items
  2. Deduplicate similar issues
  3. Create issues with cross-references where related
  4. Update tracking with issue numbers

Best Practices

  1. Be specific — Include package, function, and line if known
  2. Provide context — Explain what task led to discovery
  3. Include workaround — If you found one, share it
  4. Link related issues — Reference if similar issues exist
  5. Stay constructive — Focus on improvement, not complaint

References