stakeholder-update
npx skills add https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill stakeholder-update
Agent 安装分布
Skill 文档
Stakeholder Update Skill
This skill creates effective status updates for executives and stakeholders following the BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) principle.
Update Structure
1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
Start with the most important information:
- Status: ð¢ On track / ð¡ At risk / ð´ Blocked / â Complete
- Key Takeaway: One sentence summary of current state
- Action Needed: What you need from stakeholders (if anything)
2. Progress Summary
Brief overview of accomplishments:
- What shipped this period
- Milestones achieved
- Key metrics movement
Keep to 3-5 bullet points maximum.
3. Metrics Dashboard
Key Metrics
| Metric | Current | Target | Trend | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Metric name] | [Value] | [Target] | â/â/â | ð¢/ð¡/ð´ |
Include 3-5 most important metrics only.
4. Risks & Blockers
High Priority Issues:
- Issue: Brief description
- Impact: What’s at stake
- Mitigation: What you’re doing about it
- Help Needed: What stakeholders can do (if applicable)
Only include issues that matter at executive level.
5. Upcoming Milestones
Next 30 Days:
- Milestone (expected date)
- Milestone (expected date)
Next 90 Days:
- Major milestone (month)
- Major milestone (month)
6. Decisions Needed (if applicable)
- Decision: Clear description
- Options: 2-3 options with pros/cons
- Recommendation: What you recommend and why
- Timeline: When decision is needed
Writing Guidelines
Tone: Professional, concise, action-oriented Length: Keep under 1 page (or 2 minutes reading time) Frequency: Weekly for active projects, bi-weekly for maintenance
Executive Communication Principles:
-
Lead with conclusions, not process
- â “We ran 5 experiments this week and analyzed the data…”
- â “Conversion rate increased 15% from optimization work”
-
Focus on impact, not activities
- â “Held 12 customer interviews”
- â “Identified #1 barrier to adoption (complexity of setup)”
-
Make problems visible early
- Don’t sugarcoat risks
- Propose solutions, not just problems
- Be specific about help needed
-
Use data to tell story
- Quantify whenever possible
- Show trends, not just snapshots
- Connect metrics to business outcomes
-
Make it scannable
- Use headers and bullet points
- Bold key information
- Use visual indicators (ð¢ð¡ð´, âââ)
Status Guidelines
ð¢ On Track: Meeting all targets, no significant risks ð¡ At Risk: Potential issues that could impact delivery ð´ Blocked: Critical issues preventing progress, needs intervention
Example Update
# Product Update: Customer Onboarding Redesign
**Week of Jan 20, 2026**
## BLUF
**Status**: ð¡ At Risk
**Key Takeaway**: New onboarding flow is performing well in tests (+35% completion), but launch delayed one week due to integration issues with billing system.
**Action Needed**: Decision needed on whether to launch onboarding separately or wait for billing integration fix.
## Progress Summary
- Completed user testing with 24 participants (94% positive feedback)
- Implemented first-time user experience improvements
- Resolved 12 of 15 bugs identified in QA
- Engineering allocated resources to billing integration fix
## Key Metrics
| Metric | Current | Target | Trend | Status |
|--------|---------|--------|-------|--------|
| Onboarding Completion | 45% | 60% | â | ð¡ |
| Time to First Value | 4.2 min | 3.0 min | â | ð¢ |
| Setup Support Tickets | 45/week | <30/week | â | ð¢ |
| User Activation Rate | 52% | 65% | â | ð¡ |
## Risks & Blockers
**HIGH: Billing System Integration Delay**
- **Impact**: Prevents users from completing onboarding flow; delays launch by 1-2 weeks
- **Root Cause**: API deprecation by payment processor, requires code rewrite
- **Mitigation**: Engineering team reallocated resources, fix ETA Feb 3
- **Decision Needed**: Launch onboarding without payment integration or wait for fix? (See below)
**MEDIUM: Mobile Testing Coverage**
- **Impact**: Some edge cases on older Android devices not tested
- **Mitigation**: Partnering with QA to expand test matrix; running beta with internal users on diverse devices
## Upcoming Milestones
**Next 30 Days:**
- Resolve billing integration (Feb 3)
- Launch onboarding redesign (Feb 5 or Feb 12 depending on decision)
- Begin measuring impact on conversion (Feb 12)
**Next 90 Days:**
- Iterate based on production data (March)
- Extend to mobile app (April)
- Launch advanced features (May)
## Decision Needed
**Should we launch onboarding separately from billing integration?**
**Option A: Launch Now (Recommended)**
- Pros: Get 35% completion rate improvement to users immediately, gather production data, maintain momentum
- Cons: Users need to complete payment in old flow, slightly disjointed experience
- Timeline: Launch Feb 5
**Option B: Wait for Billing Fix**
- Pros: Fully integrated experience from day one, no technical debt
- Cons: Delays benefits by 2 weeks, Q1 metric targets at risk, team momentum lost
- Timeline: Launch Feb 12
**Recommendation**: Option A. The onboarding improvements are valuable independently, and the old payment flow works fine. Waiting risks missing Q1 targets and delays validated improvements from reaching users.
**Timeline**: Need decision by Jan 22 for Feb 5 launch.
---
**Questions?** Reply to this email or ping me on Slack.
Frequency Guidance
Daily standups:
- Ultra-brief (3 bullets)
- What shipped yesterday
- What’s shipping today
- Blockers
Weekly updates:
- Use full template above
- Focus on progress and risks
- Keep to 1 page
Monthly reviews:
- Deeper metrics analysis
- Strategic reflections
- Quarterly goal progress
- Longer format (2-3 pages) acceptable
Quarterly business reviews:
- Comprehensive analysis
- Trends over time
- Strategic recommendations
- Presentation format
Adaptation by Audience
For C-Suite
- Lead with business impact
- Connect to company OKRs
- Focus on strategy and outcomes
- Minimize technical details
For Product/Engineering Leadership
- Include technical context
- Show sprint/milestone progress
- Discuss architecture implications
- Reference technical debt
For Cross-Functional Teams
- Balance technical and business context
- Highlight dependencies
- Call out collaboration needs
- Make asks explicit
For Board/Investors
- Focus on metrics and traction
- Competitive positioning
- Market opportunities
- Financial implications