prd-v04-user-journey-mapping
npx skills add https://github.com/mattgierhart/prd-driven-context-engineering --skill prd-v04-user-journey-mapping
Agent 安装分布
Skill 文档
User Journey Mapping
Position in workflow: v0.4 Persona Definition â v0.4 User Journey Mapping â v0.4 Screen Flow Definition
User journeys transform features into paths. A journey answers: “How does [persona] go from [trigger] to [value moment] using [features]?”
Journey Types
| Type | Purpose | Priority Signal | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core | Primary value delivery | Must complete for activation | First report generated |
| Onboarding | First-time user setup | Blocks all other journeys | Account creation â first action |
| Recovery | Error handling, support | Retention protection | Password reset, billing issue |
| Power User | Advanced workflows | Expansion/upsell | Bulk operations, integrations |
Rule: Define Onboarding first (it gates everything), then Core journeys (they deliver KPI-), then others.
Journey Anatomy
Every journey has:
- Trigger â What causes the user to start? (Event, not “opens app”)
- Steps â Actions linked to FEA- features
- Pain Points â Where friction exists (design around these)
- Moment of Value â When user achieves goal (this drives KPI-)
Mapping Process
-
Pull PER- (personas) from Persona Definition
- Each journey belongs to a specific persona
-
Pull FEA- (features) and KPI- (outcomes) from v0.3
- Features are the building blocks of journey steps
- KPIs tell you which journeys matter most
-
Define trigger events
- What causes the user to start this journey?
- Be specific: “Receives calendar invite” not “opens app”
-
Map step flow using features
- Each step = an action the user takes
- Link each step to the FEA- that enables it
-
Identify pain points
- Where might the user get confused, frustrated, or blocked?
- These inform UX design decisions
-
Mark “moments of value”
- When does the user get the payoff?
- This should tie to KPI- measurement
-
Create UJ- entries with full traceability
UJ- Output Template
UJ-XXX: [Journey Title]
Persona: [PER-XXX]
Type: [Core | Onboarding | Recovery | Power User]
Trigger: [Event that initiates journey]
Goal: [What user wants to accomplish]
Steps:
1. [Action] â FEA-XXX
2. [Action] â FEA-XXX
3. [Action] â FEA-XXX
...
Pain Points:
- [Step X]: [Potential friction â e.g., "requires context switch"]
- [Step Y]: [Potential friction]
Moment of Value: [When user achieves goal â be specific]
KPI Link: [KPI-XXX this journey drives]
Success Metric: [How we measure journey completion]
Dependencies: [BR-XXX constraints, API-XXX if known]
Example UJ- entry:
UJ-001: First Report Generation
Persona: PER-001 (Overwhelmed Ops Manager)
Type: Core
Trigger: User completes onboarding and sees empty dashboard
Goal: Generate first automated report to see time-saving value
Steps:
1. Click "Create Report" â FEA-003 (one-click reports)
2. Select data source â FEA-001 (auto-sync)
3. Choose report template â FEA-008 (templates)
4. Preview report â FEA-003
5. Export/share report â FEA-009 (export)
Pain Points:
- Step 2: User may not have connected data source yet (dependency on UJ-002)
- Step 3: Template overload if too many choices
Moment of Value: Seeing the completed report with their actual data
KPI Link: KPI-002 (activation rate)
Success Metric: Time from "Create Report" click to export ⤠5 minutes
Dependencies: BR-015 (data format rules), UJ-002 (data source connection)
Feature-to-Journey Validation
After mapping journeys, validate:
- No orphaned features: Every FEA- appears in at least one UJ-
- No journey gaps: Every step has a FEA- that enables it
- KPI coverage: Core journeys tie to Tier 1/2 KPIs
If a FEA- isn’t in any journey, either:
- Add it to a journey (you missed a use case), or
- Cut it from scope (it’s not needed)
Journey Sequencing
Map dependencies between journeys:
UJ-000: Onboarding (gates all)
â
UJ-001: First Report (Core) â KPI-002 (activation)
â
UJ-002: Data Source Connection (Core) â KPI-003 (depth)
â
UJ-003: Team Invite (Power User) â KPI-004 (expansion)
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
| Anti-Pattern | Signal | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Feature-first journeys | Steps = feature list dumped in order | Start with user goal, then map features to it |
| No trigger | “User opens app” | Define specific event: “receives notification” |
| No value moment | Journey ends without payoff | Each journey needs clear outcome |
| Orphaned features | FEA- not in any journey | Add to journey or cut from scope |
| Generic personas | “User does X” | Specify PER-: “PER-001 does X” |
| Happy path only | No pain points identified | Anticipate where users struggle |
| Mega-journeys | 15+ steps | Split into sub-journeys |
Quality Gates
Before proceeding to Screen Flow Definition:
- Onboarding journey defined first
- All Core journeys mapped to KPI-
- Every FEA- appears in at least one journey
- Every journey has a specific trigger (not “opens app”)
- Pain points identified for friction design
- Journey dependencies documented
Downstream Connections
UJ- entries feed into:
| Consumer | What It Uses | Example |
|---|---|---|
| v0.4 Screen Flow Definition | Steps become screens | UJ-001 Step 3 â SCR-005 |
| v0.6 Technical Specification | Journeys inform API sequences | UJ-001 â API-001, API-002 flow |
| v0.7 Test Planning | Journeys become E2E tests | TEST-020 validates UJ-001 |
| v0.9 GTM | Journey-based onboarding messaging | “Complete [UJ-001] in 5 minutes” |
Detailed References
- Journey mapping examples: See
references/examples.md - UJ- entry template: See
assets/uj.md - Journey sequencing guide: See
references/sequencing.md