codex-think-about

📁 lploc94/codex_skill 📅 1 day ago
1
总安装量
1
周安装量
#77587
全站排名
安装命令
npx skills add https://github.com/lploc94/codex_skill --skill codex-think-about

Agent 安装分布

amp 1
cline 1
opencode 1
cursor 1
continue 1
kimi-cli 1

Skill 文档

Codex Think About

Purpose

Use this skill for peer reasoning, not code review. Claude and Codex are equal thinkers.

Prerequisites

  • A clear question or decision topic from the user.
  • codex CLI installed and authenticated.
  • codex-review skill pack is installed (npx github:lploc94/codex_skill).

Runner

RUNNER="{{RUNNER_PATH}}"

Workflow

  1. Ask user to choose reasoning effort level: low, medium, high, or xhigh (default: high). Gather factual context only (no premature opinion). Set EFFORT to their choice.
  2. Build round-1 prompt from references/prompts.md.
  3. Start Codex thread with node "$RUNNER" start --working-dir "$PWD" --effort "$EFFORT".
  4. Poll with adaptive intervals (Round 1: 60s/60s/30s/15s…, Round 2+: 30s/15s…). After each poll, report specific activities from poll output (e.g. which files Codex is reading, what topic it is analyzing). See references/workflow.md for parsing guide. NEVER report generic “Codex is running” — always extract concrete details.
  5. Claude responds with agree/disagree points and new perspectives.
  6. Resume via --thread-id and loop until consensus or stalemate.
  7. Present user-facing synthesis with agreements, disagreements, and confidence.

Effort Level Guide

Level Depth Best for
low Surface check Quick sanity check
medium Standard review Most day-to-day work
high Deep analysis Important features
xhigh Exhaustive Critical/security-sensitive

Required References

  • Execution loop: references/workflow.md
  • Prompt templates: references/prompts.md
  • Output contract: references/output-format.md

Rules

  • Keep roles as peers; no reviewer/implementer framing.
  • Separate facts from opinions.
  • Detect stalemate when arguments repeat with no new evidence.
  • End with clear recommendations and open questions.