react-coding-standards

📁 lichens-innovation/skills 📅 3 days ago
10
总安装量
9
周安装量
#30349
全站排名
安装命令
npx skills add https://github.com/lichens-innovation/skills --skill react-coding-standards

Agent 安装分布

gemini-cli 9
github-copilot 9
codex 9
kimi-cli 9
cursor 9
amp 9

Skill 文档

React & TypeScript coding standards

This skill applies company coding standards expressed as Avoid (anti-patterns) and Prefer (recommended patterns) to in-code patterns only. For file and folder naming and structure, use react-files-structure-standards.

Reference categories

Standards are defined in the references/ folder. Load these files when you need the exact Avoid/Prefer rules and examples:

Category File Scope
Coding patterns references/common-coding-patterns.md TypeScript (types, control flow, errors, enums, destructuring, etc.)
Naming patterns references/common-naming-patterns.md In-code naming (boolean prefixes, descriptive names)
React patterns references/common-react-patterns.md Hooks, components, JSX, state, styling, fragments
Unit testing references/common-unit-testing.md Jest, React Testing Library, AAA, mocks, selectors

Three-phase workflow

When the skill is invoked on code (selected files, git staged files, branch):

Preliminary — Run linter

  1. Run the project linter: yarn lint or npm run lint (use the one that matches the project).
  2. Collect every reported rule violation (rule id/name, file, line, message).
  3. For each violation:
    • If the rule is auto-fixable (e.g. --fix / eslint --fix), run the fix (e.g. yarn lint --fix or npm run lint --fix) and consider the violation resolved.
    • If the fix is not automatic, open the corresponding reference in references/*.md (coding → common-coding-patterns, naming → common-naming-patterns, React → common-react-patterns, tests → common-unit-testing) and apply the Prefer correction described for that rule.
  4. Re-run the linter after fixes; repeat until lint passes or only violations that need manual interpretation remain.

Phase 1 — Collect violations

  1. Analyze the provided code against the reference files above.
  2. Identify every place where the code matches an Avoid pattern.
  3. List each violation in a single report with:
    • Category (coding / naming / React / unit testing)
    • Rule name (e.g. “Avoid Using any for Type Definitions”)
    • Location (file and line or snippet)
    • Short reason (what is wrong)
  4. If no Avoid pattern is found, state that the code complies and stop. Otherwise proceed to Phase 2.

Phase 2 — Apply corrections

  1. For each violation in the report:
    • Open the corresponding reference file and find the Prefer section paired with that Avoid rule.
    • Apply the recommended correction so the code follows the Prefer pattern.
  2. Preserve business logic and behavior; only change structure, naming, or patterns.
  3. Prefer minimal edits: one logical change per violation, no unnecessary rewrites.
  4. When several standards apply to the same area, prioritize: TypeScript safety → naming clarity → React architecture → testing structure.

Rules of thumb

  • Strict avoid/prefer: Only treat as violations what is explicitly described as Avoid in the reference files; only apply fixes that are explicitly described as Prefer there.
  • One violation, one fix: One Avoid → one corresponding Prefer; do not mix multiple rules in a single edit unless they target the same line.
  • Readability and maintainability: After corrections, the code should be easier to read and maintain, without changing behavior.

Quick reference

  • Lint first: Run yarn lint or npm run lint; fix auto-fixable issues, then resolve remaining ones using references/*.md.
  • Collect next: Complete the full list of Avoid violations (manual analysis) before making edits.
  • Then redress: Apply each Prefer in turn, using the reference file as the source of truth.
  • File/folder naming: Use react-files-structure-standards for normalizing file and folder names and structure.