meddic-scorecard
9
总安装量
9
周安装量
#32044
全站排名
安装命令
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill meddic-scorecard
Agent 安装分布
opencode
9
gemini-cli
9
codex
8
claude-code
7
github-copilot
7
cursor
7
Skill 文档
MEDDIC Scorecard
Build systematic deal scorecards using MEDDIC/MEDDPICC methodology to improve pipeline hygiene, forecast accuracy, and coaching effectiveness.
When to Use This Skill
- Weekly pipeline reviews
- Deal coaching sessions
- Forecast call preparation
- Win/loss analysis
- Sales enablement training
Methodology Foundation
Based on PTC’s MEDDIC (Dick Dunkel) extended to MEDDPICC, creating standardized scorecards for:
- Deal qualification scoring
- Gap identification
- Coaching prioritization
- Forecast confidence
What Claude Does vs What You Decide
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Creates scorecard templates | Deal stage thresholds |
| Suggests scoring criteria | Coaching priorities |
| Identifies deal gaps | Forecast commits |
| Generates coaching questions | Resource allocation |
| Tracks deal progression | Win strategy |
Instructions
Step 1: Define Scoring Criteria
MEDDPICC Components:
| Component | Definition | Scoring Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Metrics | Quantified business outcomes | 15% |
| Economic Buyer | Budget authority identified | 15% |
| Decision Criteria | How they’ll evaluate | 10% |
| Decision Process | Steps to purchase | 10% |
| Paper Process | Legal/procurement | 10% |
| Identify Pain | Business problem articulated | 15% |
| Champion | Internal advocate confirmed | 15% |
| Competition | Competitive landscape known | 10% |
Step 2: Create Scoring Rubric
Per-Component Scoring (0-3):
| Score | Definition | Evidence Required |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Unknown | No information gathered |
| 1 | Identified | Basic information, not verified |
| 2 | Validated | Confirmed with prospect |
| 3 | Leveraged | Actively using in deal strategy |
Step 3: Build Stage Gates
Stage-Score Alignment:
| Stage | Minimum Score | Required 3s |
|---|---|---|
| Discovery | 8/24 | Pain |
| Qualification | 12/24 | Pain, Champion |
| Demo/Evaluation | 16/24 | Pain, Champion, Criteria |
| Proposal | 18/24 | + Economic Buyer |
| Negotiation | 21/24 | + Paper Process |
| Commit | 22/24 | All components validated |
Step 4: Track and Coach
Weekly Review Focus:
- Deals below stage threshold
- Score changes (positive/negative)
- Gaps in critical components
- Champion health check
- Competition updates
Step 5: Analyze Patterns
Pipeline Health Metrics:
- Average score by stage
- Conversion rates by score threshold
- Most common gaps
- Champion strength correlation
Examples
Example 1: Complete Deal Scorecard
Input:
Create a MEDDPICC scorecard for:
- Deal: Enterprise software sale, $400K
- Stage: Proposal
- Champion: VP of Operations
- EB: CFO (not met)
- Timeline: Q1 close
Output:
## MEDDPICC Deal Scorecard
### Deal Overview
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Account | [Customer Name] |
| Opportunity | Enterprise Platform |
| Value | $400,000 ARR |
| Stage | Proposal |
| Close Date | Q1 (March 30) |
| AE | [Name] |
| Last Updated | [Date] |
---
### Score Summary
**Total Score: 16/24** | Stage Requirement: 18/24
| Component | Score | Stage Req | Status |
|-----------|-------|-----------|--------|
| Metrics | 2/3 | 2 | â
|
| Economic Buyer | 1/3 | **3** | â GAP |
| Decision Criteria | 3/3 | 2 | â
|
| Decision Process | 2/3 | 2 | â
|
| Paper Process | 1/3 | 2 | â ï¸ GAP |
| Identify Pain | 3/3 | 3 | â
|
| Champion | 3/3 | 3 | â
|
| Competition | 1/3 | 2 | â ï¸ GAP |
**Status: NOT READY FOR PROPOSAL** - 3 gaps to address
---
### Component Details
#### Metrics (2/3) â
On Track
**Current State:**
- ROI target: 3x in Year 1 â
- Primary KPI: Reduce processing time 40% â
- CFO business case: Not yet presented â
**Evidence:**
> "If we hit 40% reduction, that's $1.2M in operational savings"
> â VP Operations, Discovery Call
**To reach 3/3:**
- [ ] Present business case to CFO
- [ ] Get CFO to validate assumptions
---
#### Economic Buyer (1/3) â CRITICAL GAP
**Current State:**
- EB Identified: CFO Jennifer Walsh â
- Access: Email only, no meeting â
- Engagement: Unknown priorities â
**Gap Analysis:**
We have not met the Economic Buyer. This is a **deal blocker**
for Proposal stage. Champion (VP Ops) reports to CFO but has
not secured meeting.
**Action Required:**
- [ ] Ask Champion for CFO meeting this week
- [ ] Prepare executive briefing deck
- [ ] Identify CFO's priorities for Q1
**Coaching Questions:**
1. "What's preventing us from meeting the CFO?"
2. "What does your champion say about CFO's priorities?"
3. "Can we propose a joint call with champion + CFO?"
---
#### Decision Criteria (3/3) â
Strong
**Current State:**
- Formal criteria documented â
- Weighted by priority â
- Aligned with our strengths â
**Evidence:**
| Criterion | Weight | Our Fit |
|-----------|--------|---------|
| Integration depth | 30% | Strong |
| Time to value | 25% | Strong |
| Total cost | 20% | Medium |
| Support | 15% | Strong |
| References | 10% | Strong |
---
#### Decision Process (2/3) â ï¸ Needs Validation
**Current State:**
- Steps identified â
- Timeline mapped â
- Approvers known â
- Specific dates: Partial â
**Process Map:**
Step 1: Technical evaluation â Complete Step 2: Business review â Complete Step 3: Proposal review â³ This week Step 4: CFO approval â³ [Date TBD] Step 5: Legal/Procurement â³ [Timeline unknown] Step 6: Signature â³ Target: March 30
**To reach 3/3:**
- [ ] Confirm CFO meeting date
- [ ] Map procurement timeline
- [ ] Identify potential delays
---
#### Paper Process (1/3) â ï¸ GAP
**Current State:**
- Legal review required: Likely â
- Timeline: Unknown â
- Procurement contact: Not identified â
- Standard terms acceptable: Unknown â
**Risk Assessment:**
Paper process is a common source of deal slip at this stage.
Unknown timeline creates forecast risk.
**Action Required:**
- [ ] Ask champion about procurement process
- [ ] Identify legal/procurement contacts
- [ ] Offer to start MSA review early
---
#### Identify Pain (3/3) â
Strong
**Current State:**
- Pain articulated â
- Quantified impact â
- Urgency established â
- Consequences of inaction clear â
**Pain Statement:**
> "Manual processing is costing us 8,000 hours/year. We've
> missed SLAs 3 times this quarter. If we don't fix this,
> we'll lose the [Major Customer] contract."
**Business Impact:**
- 8,000 hours à $50/hr = $400K labor cost
- SLA penalties: $200K potential
- Customer retention risk: $2M contract
---
#### Champion (3/3) â
Strong
**Champion Profile:**
| Attribute | Assessment |
|-----------|------------|
| Name | Michael Chen, VP Operations |
| Access | Reports to CFO |
| Influence | High - owns the budget |
| Motivation | Personal - promoted if successful |
| Engagement | Weekly calls, sharing internally |
**Champion Test:**
- â
Sells when we're not in the room
- â
Shares competitive intel
- â
Gives us bad news
- â ï¸ Has not secured CFO meeting yet
---
#### Competition (1/3) â ï¸ GAP
**Current State:**
- Competitors identified: 1 known â
- Their status: Unknown â
- Their approach: Unknown â
- Our differentiation: Assumed â
**Known Information:**
- Competitor X was evaluated
- Champion said "we've narrowed to two"
- No pricing or proposal intel
**Action Required:**
- [ ] Ask champion directly about competitor status
- [ ] Understand competitor's proposal/pricing
- [ ] Prepare competitive positioning
---
### Gap Resolution Plan
| Gap | Priority | Action | Owner | Due |
|-----|----------|--------|-------|-----|
| Economic Buyer | P1 | Request CFO meeting | AE + Champion | This week |
| Competition | P2 | Discovery with champion | AE | Day 2 |
| Paper Process | P2 | Map procurement timeline | AE | Day 3 |
---
### Coaching Summary
**Primary Focus:** Get in front of CFO before sending proposal
**Key Questions to Ask in 1:1:**
1. Why haven't we met the Economic Buyer yet?
2. What do we actually know about the competition?
3. What could cause this deal to slip past Q1?
**Forecast Recommendation:**
- Current: In forecast at 50%
- Recommendation: Keep at 50% until CFO meeting secured
- Path to 80%: EB meeting + Competition clarity + Paper process mapped
Example 2: Pipeline Review Summary
Input:
Summarize MEDDPICC health for these 5 deals:
1. Deal A: 22/24 (Commit stage)
2. Deal B: 14/24 (Proposal stage)
3. Deal C: 18/24 (Demo stage)
4. Deal D: 10/24 (Qualification stage)
5. Deal E: 16/24 (Negotiation stage)
Output:
## Pipeline MEDDPICC Health Summary
### Overview
| Deal | Stage | Score | Req'd | Status |
|------|-------|-------|-------|--------|
| Deal A | Commit | 22/24 | 22 | â
On track |
| Deal B | Proposal | 14/24 | 18 | â 4 pts below |
| Deal C | Demo | 18/24 | 16 | â
Above req |
| Deal D | Qualification | 10/24 | 12 | â 2 pts below |
| Deal E | Negotiation | 16/24 | 21 | â 5 pts below |
**Pipeline Health: 2/5 deals on track (40%)**
---
### Priority Attention
| Priority | Deal | Issue | Recommended Action |
|----------|------|-------|-------------------|
| P1 | Deal E | 5 pts below in Negotiation | Pull back to Proposal |
| P2 | Deal B | 4 pts below in Proposal | Hold proposal, fill gaps |
| P3 | Deal D | 2 pts below in Qualification | Accelerate discovery |
---
### Deal E (CRITICAL)
**Problem:** In Negotiation stage with 16/24 score (req: 21)
This deal is at high risk. Likely gaps in:
- Economic Buyer (not confirmed?)
- Paper Process (not mapped?)
- Competition (unknown?)
**Recommendation:** Do not forecast this deal. Move back to
Proposal stage and address gaps before continuing negotiation.
---
### Common Gaps Across Pipeline
| Component | Avg Score | Concern |
|-----------|-----------|---------|
| Paper Process | 1.2/3 | Most common gap |
| Competition | 1.4/3 | Frequent blind spot |
| Economic Buyer | 1.8/3 | Access issue |
**Coaching Focus:** Paper Process discovery earlier in cycle
Skill Boundaries
What This Skill Does Well
- Creating structured scorecards
- Identifying deal gaps
- Generating coaching questions
- Tracking deal progression
What This Skill Cannot Do
- Access your CRM data
- Know specific deal context
- Make forecast decisions
- Replace sales judgment
Iteration Guide
Follow-up Prompts:
- “Create coaching questions for [component]”
- “What should we ask about [specific gap]?”
- “Design stage gate criteria for our process”
- “Analyze win/loss patterns from scorecards”
References
- PTC MEDDIC Methodology (Dick Dunkel)
- Force Management MEDDICC
- Winning by Design Sales Process
- Gong Sales Coaching Research
Related Skills
lead-qualification-meddic– Full qualification frameworkdeal-risk-scoring– Risk assessmentpipeline-forecasting– Forecast methodology
Skill Metadata
- Domain: Sales
- Complexity: Intermediate
- Mode: centaur
- Time to Value: 15-30 min per deal
- Prerequisites: Deal information, CRM access