keep-it-simple
3
总安装量
2
周安装量
#56598
全站排名
安装命令
npx skills add https://github.com/elliotjlt/claude-skill-potions --skill keep-it-simple
Agent 安装分布
opencode
2
codex
2
claude-code
2
amp
1
kimi-cli
1
github-copilot
1
Skill 文档
Keep It Simple
When To Activate
Instructions
The YAGNI Test
Before adding abstraction, answer honestly:
## Complexity Check
**I want to add:** [describe the abstraction]
**Because:** [your justification]
**Is this solving a problem we have TODAY?**
- [ ] Yes, we have 3+ concrete cases now
- [ ] No, but we might need it later
**If "might need later":** Don't build it. Stop.
The Rule of Three
Abstract when you have three concrete cases, not before:
| Situation | Action |
|---|---|
| 1 case | Just write it |
| 2 cases | Copy-paste is fine. Note the duplication. |
| 3 cases | Now consider abstracting |
// With 1 button: just make the button
<button class="blue">Save</button>
// With 2 buttons: copy-paste is fine
<button class="blue">Save</button>
<button class="red">Delete</button>
// With 3+ buttons: NOW consider a component
<Button color="blue">Save</Button>
<Button color="red">Delete</Button>
<Button color="gray">Cancel</Button>
Abstraction Warning Signs
Watch for these phrases in your thinking:
- “For flexibility…” â Flexibility for what? Do we need it?
- “In case we need to…” â We don’t need to yet.
- “This could be configurable…” â Is anyone asking to configure it?
- “To support future…” â Future isn’t asking for support.
- “For extensibility…” â Extend it when you need to.
Watch for these patterns:
- Factory that produces one type
- Config object with one option
- Abstract class with one implementation
- Utility function used once
- Parameters that are always the same value
Simplest Solutions
| Instead of | Try |
|---|---|
| Factory pattern | Direct instantiation |
| Abstract base class | Concrete class |
| Config-driven behavior | Hardcoded behavior |
| Dependency injection | Direct imports |
| Custom event system | Callbacks |
| Generic utility | Inline code |
When Abstraction IS Right
Abstraction is warranted when:
- You have 3+ concrete, existing cases
- The pattern is stable (not still changing)
- The duplication is causing actual bugs
- You’re building a library for others
Output Format
When resisting complexity:
## Keeping It Simple
**Considered:** [the abstraction]
**Rejected because:** [only N cases / speculative / etc.]
**Instead:** [simpler approach]
When complexity is warranted:
## Abstraction Justified
**Adding:** [the abstraction]
**Because:** [3+ cases / causing bugs / stable pattern]
**Cases:** [list the concrete cases]
NEVER
- Build factories for single types
- Create abstract classes before concrete ones
- Add config options nobody asked for
- Build “infrastructure” before the feature
- Say “for future extensibility” as justification
- Create utilities for one-time operations
ALWAYS
- Start with the simplest thing that works
- Wait for three concrete cases before abstracting
- Prefer duplication over premature abstraction
- Let patterns emerge from real usage
- Ask “do we need this TODAY?”
Example
User: “Add a way to send notification emails”
Over-engineered approach:
NotificationFactory
âââ EmailNotification
âââ SMSNotification (might need later!)
âââ PushNotification (could be useful!)
âââ NotificationConfig
âââ templates
âââ retryPolicy
âââ queueSettings
YAGNI approach:
def send_notification_email(user, subject, body):
email_service.send(
to=user.email,
subject=subject,
body=body
)
Why simpler is better:
- User asked for email. Just do email.
- SMS and Push aren’t requested. Don’t build them.
- Config can be added when there’s something to configure.
- If we need SMS later, we’ll add it then.
The 5-line function solves the actual problem. The factory solves imaginary ones.
- “Just in case”: Building for cases that don’t exist yet. They may never exist.
- “It’s more elegant”: Elegance is not a requirement. Working is a requirement.
- “This pattern is best practice”: Best practices are context-dependent. A pattern for 100 cases is overkill for 1.
- Abstracting after 2 cases: You don’t know the pattern yet. Wait for the third.
- Config files for one setting: Hardcode it. Add config when there are multiple settings to configure.
- “Future-proofing”: You can’t predict the future. Build for now.
- Dependency injection everywhere: Direct imports are fine. DI is for when you actually need to swap implementations.
- Generic utilities from day one: Write the specific code. Extract utility when you have 3+ uses.
- “Flexibility”: Flexibility without a use case is just indirection.
- Building the platform before the product: Ship the feature. Build infrastructure when you need it.