Agent Orchestrator

The Agent Orchestrator skill coordinates multiple specialized AI agents, skills, and tools to accomplish complex tasks that benefit from distributed expertise. It acts as a conductor, delegating subtasks to appropriate agents, managing dependencies, integrating results, and ensuring coherent final outputs.

This skill understands the capabilities of available agents (general-purpose, operations-manager, specialized skills), determines optimal task decomposition, manages inter-agent communication, handles failures, and synthesizes diverse outputs into unified results. It’s the meta-layer that makes multi-agent collaboration effective.

Use this skill for complex projects requiring diverse expertise, tasks that benefit from parallel execution, or workflows where specialized agents outperform general-purpose approaches.

Core Workflows

Workflow 1: Decompose Task & Delegate

1. Analyze the complex task:
   • What’s the end goal?
   • What are the components?
   • What expertise is needed?
2. Map to available agents/skills:
   • Which agents have relevant capabilities?
   • What’s each agent’s specialty?
   • What tools/MCPs do they access?
3. Decompose into subtasks:
   • Break along expertise boundaries
   • Identify dependencies
   • Determine execution order
4. Delegate to appropriate agents:
   • Assign subtasks with clear instructions
   • Provide necessary context
   • Set success criteria
   • Specify output format
5. Monitor execution:
   • Track progress
   • Identify blockers
   • Handle failures
6. Integrate results:
   • Collect agent outputs
   • Resolve conflicts
   • Synthesize into coherent whole
7. Validate final result

Workflow 2: Parallel Agent Execution

1. Identify parallelizable subtasks:
   • Which tasks are independent?
   • Which share no dependencies?
   • Which can run concurrently?
2. Prepare parallel execution:
   • Assign subtasks to agents
   • Provide isolated contexts
   • Set timeout limits
3. Launch agents in parallel:
   • Initiate all at once
   • Maintain separate contexts
   • Monitor all executions
4. Coordinate completion:
   • Wait for all to finish
   • Handle stragglers
   • Manage timeout failures
5. Aggregate results:
   • Collect all outputs
   • Merge related findings
   • Resolve inconsistencies
6. Synthesize final output

Workflow 3: Sequential Agent Pipeline

1. Design pipeline flow:
   • Order agents by dependencies
   • Define handoff points
   • Specify data transformations
2. Execute pipeline sequentially:
   • Agent 1: Process initial input → Output A
   • Validate Output A
   • Agent 2: Process Output A → Output B
   • Validate Output B
   • Agent N: Process Output (N-1) → Final Output
3. Manage state between agents:
   • Pass relevant data forward
   • Maintain context where needed
   • Discard temporary artifacts
4. Handle pipeline failures:
   • Identify failed stage
   • Retry or use fallback
   • Don’t propagate bad data
5. Validate end-to-end result

Workflow 4: Adaptive Agent Selection

1. Assess task requirements dynamically:
   • What capabilities are needed?
   • What’s the complexity level?
   • What constraints exist?
2. Select best-fit agent:
   • Match capabilities to requirements
   • Consider agent availability
   • Factor in performance history
   • Choose specialist over generalist when appropriate
3. Delegate with context:
   • Provide task-specific instructions
   • Include relevant background
   • Set clear expectations
4. Evaluate agent performance:
   • Did it meet criteria?
   • Was quality sufficient?
   • Was time acceptable?
5. Learn for future selection:
   • Track which agents excel at what
   • Note failure patterns
   • Refine selection logic

Workflow 5: Error Recovery & Fallback

1. Detect agent failure:
   • Task not completed
   • Output quality insufficient
   • Timeout exceeded
   • Error thrown
2. Diagnose failure cause:
   • Was task unclear?
   • Was agent wrong choice?
   • Was input malformed?
   • Was dependency unavailable?
3. Attempt recovery:
   • Retry with same agent (if transient error)
   • Retry with different agent (if capability mismatch)
   • Simplify task and retry (if too complex)
   • Escalate to human (if unrecoverable)
4. Log failure and recovery
5. Continue workflow if recovered

Quick Reference

Best Practices

• Match Expertise to Task: Use specialized agents for specialized work

  • Operations Manager for project coordination
  • UI Builder for component design
  • Database Designer for schema work
  • Don’t use general-purpose for everything

• Provide Clear Context: Each agent needs to understand its role

  • What’s the larger goal?
  • What’s this agent’s specific responsibility?
  • What’s the expected output?
  • How does it fit in the workflow?

• Manage Dependencies: Make execution order explicit

  • Agent B needs Agent A’s output
  • Agent C can run parallel to A and B
  • Agent D waits for B and C

• Validate Handoffs: Don’t pass bad data between agents

  • Check output format
  • Verify completeness
  • Validate against schema
  • Fail fast if something’s wrong

• Handle Failures Gracefully: Agents will fail sometimes

  • Have fallback agents
  • Implement retry logic
  • Don’t cascade failures
  • Log for post-mortem

• Optimize Communication: Minimize inter-agent chatter

  • Pass only necessary data
  • Use structured formats
  • Avoid redundant information
  • Compress when appropriate

• Monitor Progress: Know what’s happening

  • Track which agents are active
  • Identify bottlenecks
  • Detect failures early
  • Provide status updates

• Synthesize Thoughtfully: Integrate diverse outputs coherently

  • Resolve conflicts
  • Maintain consistency
  • Preserve important details
  • Create unified narrative

Agent Capabilities Map

Available Agents/Skills

MCP/Tool Access

Orchestration Patterns

Pattern 1: Expert Panel

Task → [Expert A, Expert B, Expert C] → Synthesize → Decision

Use when: Need diverse perspectives on same problem Example: Architecture decision → [Performance expert, Security expert, Maintainability expert] → Recommendation

Pattern 2: Assembly Line

Task → Agent A → Agent B → Agent C → Output

Use when: Sequential transformations needed Example: Design → Implement → Test → Deploy

Pattern 3: Divide & Conquer

Task → Split → [Agent 1: Part A, Agent 2: Part B, Agent N: Part N] → Merge → Output

Use when: Large task divisible into independent parts Example: Multi-page app → [Agent per page] → Integrate

Pattern 4: Supervisor-Worker

Supervisor analyzes → Delegates to Workers → Workers execute → Supervisor integrates

Use when: Central coordination needed Example: Project manager → [Feature developers] → Integration

Pattern 5: Collaborative Refinement

Agent A: Draft → Agent B: Critique → Agent A: Revise → Validate → Output

Use when: Quality improves through iteration Example: Writer → Reviewer → Writer → Final

Pattern 6: Specialist Routing

Analyze task → Route to appropriate specialist → Specialist executes → Return

Use when: Different task types need different agents Example: Issue triage → [Bug to QA | Feature to Developer | Ops to DevOps]

Delegation Templates

Standard Delegation

**Agent**: [Agent name]
**Task**: [Clear, specific task description]
**Context**: [Relevant background information]
**Inputs**: [Provided data/resources]
**Expected Output**: [Format and content requirements]
**Success Criteria**: [How to know it's done well]
**Constraints**: [Limitations or requirements]
**Deadline**: [If time-sensitive]

Parallel Delegation

**Parallel Execution**: [N agents]

**Agent 1**: [Agent name]
- Task: [Task 1]
- Output: [Output 1]

**Agent 2**: [Agent name]
- Task: [Task 2]
- Output: [Output 2]

**Integration**: [How to combine outputs]

Pipeline Delegation

**Pipeline**: [Agent A] → [Agent B] → [Agent C]

**Stage 1**: [Agent A]
- Input: [Initial data]
- Task: [Transform 1]
- Output: [Intermediate 1]

**Stage 2**: [Agent B]
- Input: [Intermediate 1]
- Task: [Transform 2]
- Output: [Intermediate 2]

**Stage 3**: [Agent C]
- Input: [Intermediate 2]
- Task: [Transform 3]
- Output: [Final output]

Coordination Strategies

Real-Time Coordination

• When: Agents need to interact during execution
• How: Shared context, message passing, state updates
• Trade-off: More complex but more flexible

Batch Coordination

• When: Agents work independently, integrate at end
• How: Collect all outputs, then merge
• Trade-off: Simpler but less adaptive

Hierarchical Coordination

• When: Clear authority structure
• How: Supervisor delegates, workers report back
• Trade-off: Clear but potentially bottlenecked

Peer-to-Peer Coordination

• When: Agents are equals collaborating
• How: Shared workspace, mutual awareness
• Trade-off: Flexible but needs clear protocols

Conflict Resolution

When agents produce conflicting outputs:

1. Identify the conflict:

   • What’s inconsistent?
   • Which agents disagree?
   • What’s the nature of disagreement?

2. Evaluate sources:

   • Which agent is more authoritative for this?
   • What’s the confidence level?
   • What’s the reasoning?

3. Resolve using strategy:

   • Authority: Trust the specialist
   • Voting: Majority wins (if multiple agents)
   • Synthesis: Combine best of both
   • Escalate: Ask human to decide

4. Document resolution:

   • What was the conflict?
   • How was it resolved?
   • Why this choice?

Performance Optimization

Reduce Overhead

• Don’t orchestrate when single agent suffices
• Minimize handoffs and data passing
• Use parallel execution for independent tasks
• Cache repeated computations

Load Balancing

• Distribute work evenly across agents
• Avoid bottlenecks at single agent
• Consider agent capacity and speed
• Use queuing for burst workloads

Failure Isolation

• Don’t let one agent failure crash workflow
• Use circuit breakers for unreliable agents
• Have fallback options
• Implement timeout limits

Monitoring & Observability

Track these metrics:

• Agent utilization: How busy is each agent?
• Task completion time: How long per agent?
• Success rate: Which agents succeed/fail?
• Handoff efficiency: How smooth are transitions?
• Integration quality: How well do outputs combine?
• Error rate: Where do failures occur?
• Cost: Token usage per agent

Example Orchestrations

Feature Development Workflow

**Orchestrator**: Coordinate feature development

1. **Requirements Analysis** (Operations Manager)
   - Clarify requirements
   - Define scope
   - Identify constraints

2. **Parallel Design Phase**
   - **UI Builder**: Design components
   - **Database Designer**: Design schema
   - **API Designer**: Design endpoints

3. **Integration Review** (Orchestrator)
   - Ensure designs are compatible
   - Resolve conflicts
   - Approve for implementation

4. **Implementation** (General-Purpose)
   - Build based on approved designs

5. **Quality Assurance** (Testing QA)
   - Generate E2E tests
   - Run test suite
   - Report issues

6. **Fix Issues** (General-Purpose)
   - Address failing tests

7. **Deployment** (Deployment Automation)
   - Deploy to staging
   - Verify deployment
   - Deploy to production

Content Creation Pipeline

**Orchestrator**: Create technical blog post

1. **Research** (General-Purpose + Firecrawl)
   - Gather sources
   - Extract key information

2. **Parallel Analysis**
   - **Prompt Engineer**: Analyze for clarity
   - **Workflow Designer**: Identify structure
   - **Output Formatter**: Determine format

3. **Draft** (General-Purpose)
   - Write based on research and analysis

4. **Review & Edit** (Prompt Engineer)
   - Review for quality
   - Suggest improvements

5. **Revise** (General-Purpose)
   - Apply feedback

6. **Format** (Output Formatter)
   - Format for target platform

7. **Generate Metadata** (General-Purpose)
   - SEO metadata
   - Social snippets