Plan Gap Analysis

Analyze gaps between documented plans in plans/ and actual implementation.

Workflow

Phase 1: Plan Inventory

Read all plan files:

• 00-overview.md – Project summary and metrics
• 01-understand.md – Requirements and components
• 02-plan.md – Architecture decisions and roadmap
• 03-execute.md – Implementation details
• 04-review.md – Quality requirements
• 05-secure.md – Security requirements
• 06-feedback-loop.md – Refinements

Phase 2: Codebase Inventory

# List all crates
find . -name "Cargo.toml" -not -path "*/target/*"

# List source files
find . -name "*.rs" -not -path "*/target/*"

Crates to analyze:

• memory-core – Core data structures and orchestration
• memory-storage-turso – Turso/libSQL backend
• memory-storage-redb – redb cache layer
• memory-mcp – MCP server and sandbox
• test-utils – Test utilities
• benches – Performance benchmarks

Phase 3: Gap Identification

Check each phase:

Phase 4: Prioritization

Critical (Blocks production):

• Security vulnerabilities
• Data corruption risks
• Missing core functionality

High (Affects quality):

• Performance targets not met
• Test coverage below target
• Missing error handling

Medium (Technical debt):

• Code quality issues
• Documentation gaps

Phase 5: TODO Generation

## Phase [N]: [NAME]

### Critical Priority
- [ ] [Component] - [Missing item]
  - File: path/to/file.rs
  - Plan: plans/0X-phase.md:LineNumber
  - Impact: [Description]
  - Effort: [Estimate]

Output Format

# Plan Gap Analysis Report
**Total Requirements**: X
**Implemented**: Y (Z%)
**Gaps Identified**: N

## By Phase
- Phase 1: X/Y complete
- Phase 2: X/Y complete
- ...

## Critical Gaps
1. [Gap] - Priority, Effort

Best Practices

✓ Be systematic: Check every requirement ✓ Be specific: Reference exact file locations ✓ Be accurate: Verify, don’t assume ✓ Be prioritized: Critical > High > Medium > Low ✓ Be actionable: Include file paths and estimates