self-improving-agent
npx skills add https://github.com/charon-fan/agent-playbook --skill self-improving-agent
Agent 安装分布
Skill 文档
Self-Improving Agent
“An AI agent that learns from every interaction, accumulating patterns and insights to continuously improve its own capabilities.” â Based on 2025 lifelong learning research
Overview
This is a universal self-improvement system that learns from ALL skill experiences, not just PRDs. It implements a complete feedback loop with:
- Multi-Memory Architecture: Semantic + Episodic + Working memory
- Self-Correction: Detects and fixes skill guidance errors
- Self-Validation: Periodically verifies skill accuracy
- Hooks Integration: Auto-triggers on skill events (before_start, after_complete, on_error)
- Evolution Markers: Traceable changes with source attribution
Research-Based Design
Based on 2025 research:
| Research | Key Insight | Application |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleMem | Efficient lifelong memory | Pattern accumulation system |
| Multi-Memory Survey | Semantic + Episodic memory | World knowledge + experiences |
| Lifelong Learning | Continuous task stream learning | Learn from every skill use |
| Evo-Memory | Test-time lifelong learning | Real-time adaptation |
The Self-Improvement Loop
âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ
â UNIVERSAL SELF-IMPROVEMENT â
âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ¤
â â
â Skill Event â Extract Experience â Abstract Pattern â Update â
â â â â â â
â â¼ â¼ â¼ â¼ â
â âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ â
â â MULTI-MEMORY SYSTEM â â
â ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ⤠â
â â Semantic Memory â Episodic Memory â Working Memory â â
â â (Patterns/Rules) â (Experiences) â (Current) â â
â â memory/semantic/ â memory/episodic/ â memory/working/â â
â âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ â
â â
â âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ â
â â FEEDBACK LOOP â â
â â User Feedback â Confidence Update â Pattern Adapt â â
â âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ â
â â
âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ
When This Activates
Automatic Triggers (via hooks)
| Event | Trigger | Action |
|---|---|---|
| before_start | Any skill starts | Log session start |
| after_complete | Any skill completes | Extract patterns, update skills |
| on_error | Bash returns non-zero exit | Capture error context, trigger self-correction |
Manual Triggers
- User says “èªæè¿å”, “self-improve”, “ä»ç»éªä¸å¦ä¹ “
- User says “åæä»å¤©çç»éª”, “æ»ç»æè®”
- User asks to improve a specific skill
Evolution Priority Matrix
Trigger evolution when new reusable knowledge appears:
| Trigger | Target Skill | Priority | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| New PRD pattern discovered | prd-planner | High | Add to quality checklist |
| Architecture tradeoff clarified | architecting-solutions | High | Add to decision patterns |
| API design rule learned | api-designer | High | Update template |
| Debugging fix discovered | debugger | High | Add to anti-patterns |
| Review checklist gap | code-reviewer | High | Add checklist item |
| Perf/security insight | performance-engineer, security-auditor | High | Add to patterns |
| UI/UX spec issue | prd-planner, architecting-solutions | High | Add visual spec requirements |
| React/state pattern | debugger, refactoring-specialist | Medium | Add to patterns |
| Test strategy improvement | test-automator, qa-expert | Medium | Update approach |
| CI/deploy fix | deployment-engineer | Medium | Add to troubleshooting |
Multi-Memory Architecture
1. Semantic Memory (memory/semantic-patterns.json)
Stores abstract patterns and rules reusable across contexts:
{
"patterns": {
"pattern_id": {
"id": "pat-2025-01-11-001",
"name": "Pattern Name",
"source": "user_feedback|implementation_review|retrospective",
"confidence": 0.95,
"applications": 5,
"created": "2025-01-11",
"category": "prd_structure|react_patterns|async_patterns|...",
"pattern": "One-line summary",
"problem": "What problem does this solve?",
"solution": { ... },
"quality_rules": [ ... ],
"target_skills": [ ... ]
}
}
}
2. Episodic Memory (memory/episodic/)
Stores specific experiences and what happened:
memory/episodic/
âââ 2025/
â âââ 2025-01-11-prd-creation.json
â âââ 2025-01-11-debug-session.json
â âââ 2025-01-12-refactoring.json
{
"id": "ep-2025-01-11-001",
"timestamp": "2025-01-11T10:30:00Z",
"skill": "debugger",
"situation": "User reported data not refreshing after form submission",
"root_cause": "Empty callback in onRefresh prop",
"solution": "Implement actual refresh logic in callback",
"lesson": "Always verify callbacks are not empty functions",
"related_pattern": "callback_verification",
"user_feedback": {
"rating": 8,
"comments": "This was exactly the issue"
}
}
3. Working Memory (memory/working/)
Stores current session context:
memory/working/
âââ current_session.json # Active session data
âââ last_error.json # Error context for self-correction
âââ session_end.json # Session end marker
Self-Improvement Process
Phase 1: Experience Extraction
After any skill completes, extract:
What happened:
skill_used: {which skill}
task: {what was being done}
outcome: {success|partial|failure}
Key Insights:
what_went_well: [what worked]
what_went_wrong: [what didn't work]
root_cause: {underlying issue if applicable}
User Feedback:
rating: {1-10 if provided}
comments: {specific feedback}
Phase 2: Pattern Abstraction
Convert experiences to reusable patterns:
| Concrete Experience | Abstract Pattern | Target Skill |
|---|---|---|
| “User forgot to save PRD notes” | “Always persist thinking to files” | prd-planner |
| “Code review missed SQL injection” | “Add security checklist item” | code-reviewer |
| “Callback was empty, didn’t work” | “Verify callback implementations” | debugger |
| “Net APY position ambiguous” | “UI specs need exact relative positions” | prd-planner |
Abstraction Rules:
If experience_repeats 3+ times:
pattern_level: critical
action: Add to skill's "Critical Mistakes" section
If solution_was_effective:
pattern_level: best_practice
action: Add to skill's "Best Practices" section
If user_rating >= 7:
pattern_level: strength
action: Reinforce this approach
If user_rating <= 4:
pattern_level: weakness
action: Add to "What to Avoid" section
Phase 3: Skill Updates
Update the appropriate skill files with evolution markers:
<!-- Evolution: 2025-01-12 | source: ep-2025-01-12-001 | skill: debugger -->
## Pattern Added (2025-01-12)
**Pattern**: Always verify callbacks are not empty functions
**Source**: Episode ep-2025-01-12-001
**Confidence**: 0.95
### Updated Checklist
- [ ] Verify all callbacks have implementations
- [ ] Test callback execution paths
Correction Markers (when fixing wrong guidance):
<!-- Correction: 2025-01-12 | was: "Use callback chain" | reason: caused stale refresh -->
## Corrected Guidance
Use direct state monitoring instead of callback chains:
```typescript
// â
Do: Direct state monitoring
const prevPendingCount = usePrevious(pendingCount);
### Phase 4: Memory Consolidation
1. **Update semantic memory** (`memory/semantic-patterns.json`)
2. **Store episodic memory** (`memory/episodic/YYYY-MM-DD-{skill}.json`)
3. **Update pattern confidence** based on applications/feedback
4. **Prune outdated patterns** (low confidence, no recent applications)
## Self-Correction (on_error hook)
Triggered when:
- Bash command returns non-zero exit code
- Tests fail after following skill guidance
- User reports the guidance produced incorrect results
**Process:**
```markdown
## Self-Correction Workflow
1. Detect Error
- Capture error context from working/last_error.json
- Identify which skill guidance was followed
2. Verify Root Cause
- Was the skill guidance incorrect?
- Was the guidance misinterpreted?
- Was the guidance incomplete?
3. Apply Correction
- Update skill file with corrected guidance
- Add correction marker with reason
- Update related patterns in semantic memory
4. Validate Fix
- Test the corrected guidance
- Ask user to verify
Example:
<!-- Correction: 2025-01-12 | was: "useMemo for claimable ids" | reason: stale data at click time -->
## Self-Correction: Click-Time Computation
**Issue**: Using useMemo for claimable IDs caused stale data
**Fix**: Compute at click time for always-fresh data
**Pattern**: click_time_vs_open_time_computation
Self-Validation
Use the validation template in references/appendix.md when reviewing updates.
Hooks Integration
Wiring Hooks in Claude Code Settings
Add to Claude Code settings (~/.claude/settings.json):
{
"hooks": {
"PreToolUse": [
{
"matcher": "Bash|Write|Edit",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "bash ${SKILLS_DIR}/self-improving-agent/hooks/pre-tool.sh \"$TOOL_NAME\" \"$TOOL_INPUT\""
}
]
}
],
"PostToolUse": [
{
"matcher": "Bash",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "bash ${SKILLS_DIR}/self-improving-agent/hooks/post-bash.sh \"$TOOL_OUTPUT\" \"$EXIT_CODE\""
}
]
}
],
"Stop": [
{
"matcher": "",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "bash ${SKILLS_DIR}/self-improving-agent/hooks/session-end.sh"
}
]
}
]
}
}
Replace ${SKILLS_DIR} with your actual skills path.
Additional References
See references/appendix.md for memory structure, workflow diagrams, metrics, feedback templates, and research links.
Best Practices
DO
- â Learn from EVERY skill interaction
- â Extract patterns at the right abstraction level
- â Update multiple related skills
- â Track confidence and apply counts
- â Ask for user feedback on improvements
- â Use evolution/correction markers for traceability
- â Validate guidance before applying broadly
DON’T
- â Over-generalize from single experiences
- â Update skills without confidence tracking
- â Ignore negative feedback
- â Make changes that break existing functionality
- â Create contradictory patterns
- â Update skills without understanding context
Quick Start
After any skill completes, this agent automatically:
- Analyzes what happened
- Extracts patterns and insights
- Updates relevant skill files
- Logs to memory for future reference
- Reports summary to user