do-work

📁 bladnman/do-work 📅 Jan 27, 2026
189
总安装量
189
周安装量
#1417
全站排名
安装命令
npx skills add https://github.com/bladnman/do-work --skill do-work

Agent 安装分布

claude-code 162
opencode 118
codex 111
gemini-cli 105
antigravity 64

Skill 文档

Do-Work Skill

A unified entry point for task capture and processing.

Actions:

  • do: Capture new tasks/requests → creates UR folder (verbatim input) + REQ files (queue items), always paired
  • work: Process pending requests → executes the queue
  • verify: Evaluate captured REQs against original input → quality check
  • cleanup: Consolidate archive → moves loose REQs into UR folders, closes completed URs

Core concept: The do action always produces both a UR folder (preserving the original input) and REQ files (the queue items). Each REQ links back to its UR via user_request frontmatter. This pairing is mandatory for all requests — simple or complex.

Routing Decision

Step 1: Parse the Input

Examine what follows “do work”:

Check these patterns in order — first match wins:

Priority Pattern Example Route
1 Empty or bare invocation do work → Ask: “Start the work loop?”
2 Action verbs only do work run, do work go, do work start → work
3 Verify keywords do work verify, do work check, do work evaluate → verify
4 Cleanup keywords do work cleanup, do work tidy, do work consolidate → cleanup
5 Version keywords do work version, do work update, do work check for updates → version
6 Changelog keywords do work changelog, do work release notes, do work what's new, do work what's changed, do work updates, do work history → version
7 Descriptive content do work add dark mode, do work [meeting notes] → do

Step 2: Preserve Payload

Critical rule: Never lose the user’s content.

Single-word rule: A single word is either a known keyword or ambiguous — it is never “descriptive content.”

  • Matches a keyword in the routing table (e.g., “version”, “verify”, “cleanup”) → route to that action directly.
  • Doesn’t match any keyword (e.g., “refactor”, “optimize”) → ambiguous. Ask: “Do you want to add ‘{word}‘ as a new request, or did you mean something else?”

Only route to do when the input is clearly descriptive — multiple words, a sentence, a feature request, etc.

If routing is genuinely unclear AND multi-word content was provided:

  • Default to do (adding a task)
  • Hold onto $ARGUMENTS
  • If truly ambiguous, ask: “Add this as a request, or start the work loop?”
  • User replies with just “add” or “work” → proceed with original content

Action Verbs (→ Work)

These signal “process the queue”: run, go, start, begin, work, process, execute, build, continue, resume

Verify Verbs (→ Verify)

These signal “check request quality”: verify, check, evaluate, review requests, review reqs, audit

Note: “check” routes to verify ONLY when used alone or with a target (e.g., “do work check UR-003”). When followed by descriptive content it routes to do (e.g., “do work check if the button works” → do).

Cleanup Verbs (→ Cleanup)

These signal “consolidate the archive”: cleanup, clean up, tidy, consolidate, organize archive, fix archive

Changelog Verbs (→ Version)

These signal “show release notes”: changelog, release notes, what’s new, what’s changed, updates, history

Note: “updates” (plural) routes to changelog display. “update” (singular) routes to update check. Both are handled by the version action.

Content Signals (→ Do)

These signal “add a new task”:

  • Descriptive text beyond a single verb
  • Feature requests, bug reports, ideas
  • Screenshots or context
  • “add”, “create”, “I need”, “we should”

Examples

Routes to Work

  • do work → “Ready to process the queue?” (confirmation)
  • do work run → Starts work action immediately
  • do work go → Starts work action immediately

Routes to Verify

  • do work verify → Evaluates most recent UR’s REQs
  • do work verify UR-003 → Evaluates specific UR
  • do work check REQ-018 → Evaluates the UR that REQ-018 belongs to
  • do work evaluate → Evaluates most recent UR’s REQs
  • do work review requests → Evaluates most recent UR’s REQs

Routes to Cleanup

  • do work cleanup → Consolidates archive, closes completed URs
  • do work tidy → Same as cleanup
  • do work consolidate → Same as cleanup

Routes to Changelog (via Version)

  • do work changelog → Displays changelog (newest at bottom)
  • do work release notes → Same as changelog
  • do work what's new → Same as changelog
  • do work updates → Same as changelog
  • do work history → Same as changelog

Routes to Do

  • do work add dark mode → Creates REQ file + UR folder
  • do work the button is broken → Creates REQ file + UR folder
  • do work [400 words] → Creates REQ files + UR folder with full verbatim input

Payload Preservation Rules

When clarification is needed but content was provided:

  1. Do not lose $ARGUMENTS – keep the full payload in context
  2. Ask a simple question: “Add this as a request, or start the work loop?”
  3. Accept minimal replies: User says just “add” or “work”
  4. Proceed with original content: Apply the chosen action to the stored arguments
  5. Never ask the user to re-paste content

This enables a two-phase commit pattern:

  1. Capture intent payload
  2. Confirm action

Action References

Follow the detailed instructions in: