fnd.r-sizing-markets

📁 bellabe/lean-os 📅 6 days ago
1
总安装量
1
周安装量
#47365
全站排名
安装命令
npx skills add https://github.com/bellabe/lean-os --skill fnd.r-sizing-markets

Agent 安装分布

junie 1
windsurf 1
cline 1
trae 1
cursor 1

Skill 文档

Market Sizing

Calculate market opportunity with TAM/SAM/SOM and timing analysis.

Canvas Files

  • Reads: 00.mode.md (VENTURE/BOOTSTRAP affects size requirements)
  • Reads: 02.constraints.md (budget, team for SOM calculation)
  • Reads: 01.context.md (industry beliefs to validate)
  • Writes: 03.opportunity.md

Prerequisites

Before sizing market:

  • strategy/canvas/00.mode.md must exist (mode affects TAM requirements)

If missing:

"Market sizing requires business mode from 00.mode.md.

VENTURE mode needs TAM >$1B for institutional investors.
BOOTSTRAP mode can target smaller, profitable niches.

Run fnd-architect agent first."

Process

Step 1: Load Context

Read from canvas:

  • Mode from 00.mode.md → determines size thresholds
  • Constraints from 02.constraints.md → informs SOM calculation
  • Beliefs from 01.context.md → hypotheses to validate

Step 2: Calculate TAM (Total Addressable Market)

Use BOTH methods, compare results:

Top-Down Method:

TAM = Industry size from reports × relevant segment %
  • Source: Gartner, Forrester, IBISWorld, Statista
  • Cite the report and year

Bottom-Up Method:

TAM = Total potential customers × Average revenue per customer
  • Count: How many could possibly buy?
  • Price: What would they pay annually?

Validation: If methods differ >50%, investigate why.

Step 3: Calculate SAM (Serviceable Addressable Market)

Apply filters to TAM:

SAM = TAM × Geographic filter × Segment filter × Technical filter
Filter Type Example Typical Reduction
Geographic US only 30-50% of global
Segment SMB only 20-40% of total
Technical Cloud-ready 50-80% of segment
Vertical E-commerce Varies

Document each filter with rationale.

Step 4: Calculate SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market)

Apply realistic capture based on constraints from 02.constraints.md:

SOM = SAM × Realistic market share %
Timeline New Entrant With Traction Established
Year 1 0.5-1% 1-3% 3-5%
Year 3 2-5% 5-10% 10-15%
Year 5 5-10% 10-20% 15-25%

Constraint adjustments:

  • Limited budget → lower channel reach → lower SOM
  • Small team → slower sales velocity → lower SOM
  • Short runway → less time to penetrate → lower SOM

Step 5: Assess Market Timing

Why Now? Framework:

Factor Question Signals
Technology What’s newly possible? Cost drops, capability jumps
Regulation What’s newly required/allowed? New laws, compliance deadlines
Behavior What habits changed? Adoption curves, search trends
Economics What’s newly affordable? Price/performance improvements
Competition What gap exists? Incumbent weakness, market void

Score each factor 1-5:

Timing Score = Technology + Regulation + Behavior + Economics + Competition
Score Interpretation
>20 Strong timing — move fast
15-20 Good timing — proceed
10-15 Questionable — validate further
<10 Poor timing — reconsider

Step 6: Validate Against Mode

Mode TAM Requirement SAM Requirement
VENTURE >$1B >$100M
BOOTSTRAP Any (profitable niche OK) >$10M
HYBRID >$500M >$50M

If below threshold, flag:

"Market size concern for [MODE] mode:
- TAM: $[X] (requirement: $[Y])

Options:
1. Expand market definition
2. Adjacent market expansion
3. Reconsider mode (switch to BOOTSTRAP)"

Step 7: Write Output

Write to strategy/canvas/03.opportunity.md using output format below.

Output Format

# 03. Market Opportunity

## Market Size

| Level | Value | Method | Source |
|-------|-------|--------|--------|
| TAM | $[X]B | [Top-down/Bottom-up] | [Source, Year] |
| SAM | $[X]M | [Filters applied] | [Calculation] |
| SOM (3yr) | $[X]M | [Share %] × SAM | [Assumptions] |

## TAM Calculation

### Top-Down
- Industry: [Name]
- Total size: $[X] ([Source])
- Relevant segment: [X]% = $[X]

### Bottom-Up
- Potential customers: [N]
- Average deal size: $[X]/year
- TAM: [N] × $[X] = $[X]

### Reconciliation
[Explain any difference between methods]

## SAM Derivation

| Filter | Reduction | Remaining |
|--------|-----------|-----------|
| Starting TAM | - | $[X] |
| [Filter 1] | [X]% | $[X] |
| [Filter 2] | [X]% | $[X] |
| **SAM** | - | **$[X]** |

## SOM Assumptions

- Year 1 share: [X]% = $[X]
- Year 3 share: [X]% = $[X]
- Rationale: [Why these shares are achievable]

## Why Now

| Factor | Score | Evidence |
|--------|-------|----------|
| Technology | [1-5] | [What's newly possible] |
| Regulation | [1-5] | [What's changed] |
| Behavior | [1-5] | [What shifted] |
| Economics | [1-5] | [What's affordable] |
| Competition | [1-5] | [What gap exists] |
| **Total** | **[X]/25** | |

## Market Trends

### Tailwinds
- [Trend 1]: [Impact on opportunity]
- [Trend 2]: [Impact on opportunity]

### Headwinds
- [Trend 1]: [Mitigation strategy]
- [Trend 2]: [Mitigation strategy]

## Market Risks

| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|-------------|--------|------------|
| [Risk 1] | H/M/L | H/M/L | [Strategy] |
| [Risk 2] | H/M/L | H/M/L | [Strategy] |

## Mode Validation

**Mode:** [From 00.mode.md]
**TAM Requirement:** [Met/Not Met]
**Recommendation:** [Proceed/Expand/Reconsider]

Quality Criteria

Before finalizing, verify:

  • Both TAM methods calculated and reconciled
  • All SAM filters documented with rationale
  • SOM based on constraints, not aspirations
  • Timing score completed with evidence
  • Mode validation performed
  • Sources cited with years

Boundaries

  • Does NOT validate customer demand (see fnd.r-scoring-problems)
  • Does NOT guarantee market capture
  • Does NOT predict competitor response
  • Market size is estimate, not fact — cite sources
  • SOM is constrained projection, not target
  • Timing assessment is point-in-time, markets change
  • Does NOT handle multi-market or platform economics