track-session
npx skills add https://github.com/antjanus/skillbox --skill track-session
Agent 安装分布
Skill 文档
Session Progress
ð Session tracking activated – I’ll use SESSION_PROGRESS.md to track our work so we can pause and resume anytime.
Overview
Use SESSION_PROGRESS.md in the project root to track plans and progress. All planned work should be saved to SESSION_PROGRESS.md and updated over time. If the plan changes, update SESSION_PROGRESS.
Core principle: Maintain recoverable state so work can pause and resume without losing context.
Usage Modes
This skill supports four modes via optional arguments:
No argument (default): /track-session
- Automatically save current session progress to SESSION_PROGRESS.md
- Then immediately resume from that progress and continue work
- Use when you want to create a checkpoint and keep working
Save only: /track-session save
- Save current session state to SESSION_PROGRESS.md
- Stop and wait for user to continue
- Use when pausing work or reaching a natural stopping point
Resume only: /track-session resume
- Read existing SESSION_PROGRESS.md
- Load the plan, current status, and failed attempts
- Continue from where work was left off
- Use when starting a new session or returning after a break
Verify only: /track-session verify
- Read SESSION_PROGRESS.md and verify all work against initial requirements
- Check that completed tasks actually meet their goals
- Validate dependencies are satisfied
- Report gaps, incomplete work, or deviations from plan
- Use when work appears complete or before final delivery
When to Use
Always use when:
- Working on multi-phase implementations
- Planning complex refactoring across multiple files
- Pairing with user on design decisions
- Tasks that might span multiple sessions or context resets
- Long-running debugging sessions with multiple approaches
Useful for:
- Feature development with dependencies between tasks
- Large refactoring projects
- Learning new codebases with exploration notes
- Collaborative work sessions with progress tracking
Avoid when:
- Quick 1-2 file changes
- Simple bug fixes with obvious solutions
- Read-only exploration without planned changes
- Tasks that complete in under 5 minutes
When to Update
Update after:
- Completing any checklist item
- Any change in plan
- Any error or failed attempt
- Every 2-3 file modifications
- Before asking user questions
When to Verify
Run verification:
- Before declaring work complete
- After all planned tasks are checked off
- Before final delivery or handoff
- When returning to work after a long break (verify nothing regressed)
- After major refactoring (verify functionality preserved)
- When user asks “are we done?” or “did we finish everything?”
Format
# Session Progress
## Plan
- [ ] Task 1: Description [dependency: none]
- [x] Task 2: Description [dependency: Task 1]
- [ ] Task 3: Description [dependency: Task 2]
## Current Status
Last updated: [timestamp]
Working on: [current task]
Next: [immediate next step]
## Failed Attempts
- Tried [approach]: Failed because [reason], trying [alternative] instead
## Completed Work
- [timestamp] Task 2: [brief summary of what was done]
## Verification Results
(Added by /track-session verify command)
### â
Successfully Verified
- Task/Phase: Evidence of completion and correctness
### â ï¸ Minor Issues Found
- Issue: Description and impact
### â Blocking Issues
- Critical problem: What's broken and why it blocks delivery
### ð Recommended Next Steps
1. Specific action to address issues
2. Next action after that
Workflow by Mode
Mode 1: Save and Resume (Default)
Command: /track-session
Create/update SESSION_PROGRESS.md with current status, then immediately continue work. Use for checkpoints during active work, before risky changes, or at natural breaking points.
Mode 2: Save Only
Command: /track-session save
Save current state to SESSION_PROGRESS.md and stop. Use when ending a work session, pausing work, creating handoff documentation, or before taking a break.
Mode 3: Resume Only
Command: /track-session resume
Read SESSION_PROGRESS.md (error if missing), load plan/status/failed attempts, continue from checkpoint. Use when starting new session after break, recovering from context reset, or taking over work.
Mode 4: Verify Only
Command: /track-session verify
Validate completed tasks against original requirements. Checks: work actually done, requirements met, dependencies satisfied, no scope gaps. Generates report with â verified, â ï¸ minor issues, â blockers, ð next steps. Use before declaring done or delivery.
See: Detailed Verification Guide for full methodology.
Rules
- Never repeat failures – Log every failed approach with reason
- Resume from checkpoint – Check for existing SESSION_PROGRESS.md at session start
- Keep current – File should always reflect actual state
- Be specific – Include enough detail to resume work after context loss
- Verify before declaring done – Always run
/track-session verifybefore claiming work is complete - Verification is not optional – Checked boxes don’t mean work meets requirements; verification does
Examples
Example: Mode Selection
Scenario 2: Taking a lunch break
user: “Save my progress, I’ll be back in an hour” assistant: “/track-session save”
Saves current state and stops
Scenario 3: Coming back from break
user: “I’m back, let’s continue” assistant: “/track-session resume”
Reads SESSION_PROGRESS.md and continues from checkpoint
Scenario 4: Creating checkpoint mid-work
assistant: “Completed Phase 2, creating checkpoint before Phase 3” assistant: “/track-session”
Updates SESSION_PROGRESS.md with Phase 2 completion, continues to Phase 3
Scenario 5: Verifying work is complete
user: “Are we done? Did we complete everything?” assistant: “/track-session verify”
Reads SESSION_PROGRESS.md, checks all completed tasks against requirements
Reports: “â Phases 1-3 verified. â ï¸ Phase 4 tests not run. Recommend: Run test suite”
Scenario 6: End of work session verification
assistant: “All tasks appear complete. Let me verify before we finish.” assistant: “/track-session verify”
Validates all work, generates verification report
**Why this is good:** Clear separation of concerns - save for pausing, resume for continuing, no-arg for checkpointing during active work, verify for validation before delivery.
</Good>
<Bad>
```bash
# Always using save even when you want to continue
user: "Let's build authentication"
assistant: "/track-session save"
# Saves and STOPS, now user has to manually ask to resume
# Using resume without a saved session
user: "Start working on the feature"
assistant: "/track-session resume"
# ERROR: No SESSION_PROGRESS.md exists yet
# Marking tasks complete without verification
assistant: "All tasks are checked off, we're done!"
# Never ran verify to confirm work actually meets requirements
Why this is bad: Using save when you want to continue wastes time. Using resume without prior save fails. Skipping verify means potentially incomplete or incorrect work. Use no-arg mode to save+continue, and always verify before declaring completion.
Example 1: Complex Feature Implementation
Plan
- Phase 1: Research authentication libraries [dependency: none]
- Evaluated OAuth.js, Passport.js, Auth0
- Chose Passport.js for flexibility
- Phase 2: Set up OAuth flow [dependency: Phase 1]
- Configured Google OAuth provider
- Added callback routes
- Phase 3: Add user session management [dependency: Phase 2]
- Implement Redis session store
- Add session cleanup job
- Phase 4: Test authentication flows [dependency: Phase 3]
- Test login/logout
- Test session persistence
Current Status
Working on: Phase 3 – Implementing Redis session storage Next: Add Redis client configuration, then implement session middleware
Failed Attempts
- Tried in-memory sessions: Failed because sessions not persistent across server restarts, switching to Redis instead
- Attempted express-session default store: Performance issues with concurrent users, Redis solves this
Completed Work
- Phase 2 completed – OAuth flow working with Google provider
- Phase 1 completed – Selected Passport.js after comparing 3 libraries
**Why this is good:** Specific tasks with clear dependencies, documented decisions, failed attempts recorded with reasons, concrete next steps.
</Good>
<Bad>
```markdown
# Session Progress
## Plan
- [ ] Do auth stuff
- [ ] Fix sessions
- [ ] Test it
Working on auth. Tried some things that didn't work.
Why this is bad: Too vague, no dependencies tracked, no details on what failed or why, impossible to resume without starting over.
Example 2: Debugging Session
Plan
- Phase 1: Reproduce bug [dependency: none]
- Phase 2: Identify root cause [dependency: Phase 1]
- Phase 3: Implement fix [dependency: Phase 2]
- Phase 4: Verify fix with tests [dependency: Phase 3]
Current Status
Working on: Phase 3 – Implementing race condition fix Next: Add mutex lock around shared resource access in payment processor
Failed Attempts
- Checked payment API logs: No errors found, bug is client-side
- Added try-catch around payment call: Still crashes, race condition suspected
- Increased timeout values: Made it worse, confirms race condition hypothesis
Completed Work
- Phase 2 – Root cause identified: race condition in payment state management
- Phase 1 – Bug reproduced consistently with concurrent payment attempts
**Why this is good:** Clear progression through debugging phases, failed attempts inform next steps, root cause documented.
</Good>
<Bad>
```markdown
# Session Progress
Debugging payment bug. Tried a few things. Need to fix it.
Why this is bad: No systematic approach, no record of what was tried, no hypothesis tracking.
Example 3: Verification Workflow
Plan
- Phase 1: Set up authentication system
- Phase 2: Implement user registration
- Phase 3: Add email verification
- Phase 4: Write tests
Verification Results
â All phases verified with passing tests (23/23) â ï¸ Minor: Email template styling, no rate limiting ð Next: Add rate limiting, customize templates
**Why this is good:** Verification report shows evidence (test counts, specific issues), separates critical vs. nice-to-have, provides actionable next steps.
</Good>
<Bad>
```markdown
## Plan
- [x] Phase 1: Authentication
- [x] Phase 2: Registration
- [x] Phase 3: Email stuff
- [x] Phase 4: Tests
Everything is done! â¨
Why this is bad: No verification performed, no evidence work meets requirements, potentially incomplete work.
Troubleshooting
Problem: SESSION_PROGRESS.md getting too large (>1000 lines)
Cause: Not archiving completed work periodically.
Solution:
# Archive completed phases to separate file
cat SESSION_PROGRESS.md >> SESSION_ARCHIVE_2025-01.md
# Keep only active phases in SESSION_PROGRESS.md
Move completed work to archive file monthly or after major milestones.
Problem: Lost track of what was being worked on
Cause: Didn’t update “Current Status” before pausing session.
Solution:
- Update SESSION_PROGRESS.md before asking user questions
- Update before context resets
- Update every 2-3 file modifications
- Set reminder: “Last updated” timestamp should be recent
Problem: Can’t resume work after long break
Cause: Not enough detail in “Next” field.
Solution: Include specific next action with file and function names:
Next: Add mutex lock in src/payment/processor.ts:handlePayment()
around lines 45-60 where paymentState is accessed
Not just: “Next: Fix the bug”
Problem: Repeated failed attempts with same approach
Cause: Not reading or updating “Failed Attempts” section.
Solution: Before trying new approach:
- Check “Failed Attempts” section
- Verify approach is different
- Document why this attempt should work
- Add failed attempt immediately when it fails
Problem: Resume fails with “No SESSION_PROGRESS.md found”
Cause: Trying to resume without first saving a session.
Solution:
- Use
/track-session(no argument) to create initial session - Or use
/track-session saveto create SESSION_PROGRESS.md first - Resume only works when SESSION_PROGRESS.md already exists
Problem: Save mode stops work when you wanted to continue
Cause: Using save argument instead of no argument.
Solution:
- Use
/track-session saveONLY when pausing work - Use
/track-session(no arg) to checkpoint and continue - Default no-arg mode is for active work with checkpoints
Problem: Unclear which mode to use
Cause: Not understanding the difference between modes.
Solution: Quick decision guide:
- Continuing work? Use no argument (default)
- Stopping for a break? Use
save - Coming back to work? Use
resume - Think you’re done? Use
verify
Problem: Verify reports work incomplete but all tasks are checked
Cause: Tasks were marked complete without actually finishing the work, or requirements changed.
Solution:
- Review each flagged item in the verification report
- Either:
- Complete the missing work and re-verify, OR
- Update SESSION_PROGRESS.md if requirements changed
- Never skip verification – checked boxes don’t mean work is actually done
Problem: Verify mode takes too long
Cause: Too many completed tasks to verify at once.
Solution:
- Run verify incrementally after each major phase
- Don’t wait until the end to verify everything
- Use
/track-session verifyafter completing each group of related tasks - Archive verified phases to SESSION_ARCHIVE.md to reduce scope
Problem: Verify passes but work still has bugs
Cause: Verification wasn’t thorough enough (didn’t run tests, check edge cases, etc.)
Solution: Verification should include:
- Running test suites (unit, integration, e2e)
- Manual testing of key user flows
- Checking error handling and edge cases
- Validating against original acceptance criteria
- Code review of critical changes
Integration
This skill works with:
- git-worktree – Each worktree should have its own SESSION_PROGRESS.md for parallel work tracking
- All methodology skills – Track phase completion for TDD, debugging, code review workflows
- generate-skill – Use SESSION_PROGRESS.md to track multi-phase skill creation
- Long-running tasks – Any task requiring >15 minutes or multiple context resets
Integration pattern with git-worktree:
# Create worktree for feature
git worktree add ../project-feature feature-branch
cd ../project-feature
# Create separate progress tracking
echo "# Session Progress - Feature Branch" > SESSION_PROGRESS.md
# Work on feature with independent progress tracking
Pairs with:
- Commit workflows – Track progress between commits
- Testing workflows – Track test implementation phases
- Refactoring – Track refactoring phases and rollback points