brainstorming

📁 anorbert-cmyk/agentic-kit 📅 8 days ago
1
总安装量
1
周安装量
#50415
全站排名
安装命令
npx skills add https://github.com/anorbert-cmyk/agentic-kit --skill brainstorming

Agent 安装分布

amp 1
opencode 1
cursor 1
kimi-cli 1
codex 1
github-copilot 1

Skill 文档

Brainstorming & Communication Protocol

MANDATORY: Use for complex/vague requests, new features, updates.


🛑 SOCRATIC GATE (ENFORCEMENT)

When to Trigger

Pattern Action
“Build/Create/Make [thing]” without details 🛑 ASK 3 questions
Complex feature or architecture 🛑 Clarify before implementing
Update/change request 🛑 Confirm scope
Vague requirements 🛑 Ask purpose, users, constraints

🚫 MANDATORY: 3 Questions Before Implementation

  1. STOP – Do NOT start coding
  2. ASK – Minimum 3 questions:
    • 🎯 Purpose: What problem are you solving?
    • 👥 Users: Who will use this?
    • 📦 Scope: Must-have vs nice-to-have?
  3. WAIT – Get response before proceeding

🧠 Dynamic Question Generation

⛔ NEVER use static templates. Read dynamic-questioning.md for principles.

Core Principles

Principle Meaning
Questions Reveal Consequences Each question connects to an architectural decision
Context Before Content Understand greenfield/feature/refactor/debug context first
Minimum Viable Questions Each question must eliminate implementation paths
Generate Data, Not Assumptions Don’t guess—ask with trade-offs

Question Generation Process

1. Parse request → Extract domain, features, scale indicators
2. Identify decision points → Blocking vs. deferable
3. Generate questions → Priority: P0 (blocking) > P1 (high-leverage) > P2 (nice-to-have)
4. Format with trade-offs → What, Why, Options, Default

Question Format (MANDATORY)

### [PRIORITY] **[DECISION POINT]**

**Question:** [Clear question]

**Why This Matters:**
- [Architectural consequence]
- [Affects: cost/complexity/timeline/scale]

**Options:**
| Option | Pros | Cons | Best For |
|--------|------|------|----------|
| A | [+] | [-] | [Use case] |

**If Not Specified:** [Default + rationale]

For detailed domain-specific question banks and algorithms, see: dynamic-questioning.md


Progress Reporting (PRINCIPLE-BASED)

PRINCIPLE: Transparency builds trust. Status must be visible and actionable.

Status Board Format

Agent Status Current Task Progress
[Agent Name] ✅🔄⏳❌⚠️ [Task description] [% or count]

Status Icons

Icon Meaning Usage
✅ Completed Task finished successfully
🔄 Running Currently executing
⏳ Waiting Blocked, waiting for dependency
❌ Error Failed, needs attention
⚠️ Warning Potential issue, not blocking

Error Handling (PRINCIPLE-BASED)

PRINCIPLE: Errors are opportunities for clear communication.

Error Response Pattern

1. Acknowledge the error
2. Explain what happened (user-friendly)
3. Offer specific solutions with trade-offs
4. Ask user to choose or provide alternative

Error Categories

Category Response Strategy
Port Conflict Offer alternative port or close existing
Dependency Missing Auto-install or ask permission
Build Failure Show specific error + suggested fix
Unclear Error Ask for specifics: screenshot, console output

Completion Message (PRINCIPLE-BASED)

PRINCIPLE: Celebrate success, guide next steps.

Completion Structure

1. Success confirmation (celebrate briefly)
2. Summary of what was done (concrete)
3. How to verify/test (actionable)
4. Next steps suggestion (proactive)

Communication Principles

Principle Implementation
Concise No unnecessary details, get to point
Visual Use emojis (✅🔄⏳❌) for quick scanning
Specific “~2 minutes” not “wait a bit”
Alternatives Offer multiple paths when stuck
Proactive Suggest next step after completion

Anti-Patterns (AVOID)

Anti-Pattern Why
Jumping to solutions before understanding Wastes time on wrong problem
Assuming requirements without asking Creates wrong output
Over-engineering first version Delays value delivery
Ignoring constraints Creates unusable solutions
“I think” phrases Uncertainty → Ask instead