regulatory-affairs-head

📁 alirezarezvani/claude-skills 📅 Jan 19, 2026
99
总安装量
98
周安装量
#2326
全站排名
安装命令
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill regulatory-affairs-head

Agent 安装分布

claude-code 86
opencode 69
gemini-cli 69
antigravity 59
cursor 59

Skill 文档

Head of Regulatory Affairs

Regulatory strategy development, submission management, and global market access for medical device organizations.


Table of Contents


Regulatory Strategy Workflow

Develop regulatory strategy aligned with business objectives and product characteristics.

Workflow: New Product Regulatory Strategy

  1. Gather product information:
    • Intended use and indications
    • Device classification (risk level)
    • Technology platform
    • Target markets and timeline
  2. Identify applicable regulations per target market:
    • FDA (US): 21 CFR Part 820, 510(k)/PMA/De Novo
    • EU: MDR 2017/745, Notified Body requirements
    • Other markets: Health Canada, PMDA, NMPA, TGA
  3. Determine optimal regulatory pathway:
    • Compare submission types (510(k) vs De Novo vs PMA)
    • Assess predicate device availability
    • Evaluate clinical evidence requirements
  4. Develop regulatory timeline with milestones
  5. Estimate resource requirements and budget
  6. Identify regulatory risks and mitigation strategies
  7. Obtain stakeholder alignment and approval
  8. Validation: Strategy document approved; timeline accepted; resources allocated

Regulatory Pathway Selection Matrix

Factor 510(k) De Novo PMA
Predicate Available Yes No N/A
Risk Level Low-Moderate Low-Moderate High
Clinical Data Usually not required May be required Required
Review Time 90 days (MDUFA) 150 days 180 days
User Fee ~$22K (2024) ~$135K ~$440K
Best For Me-too devices Novel low-risk High-risk, novel

Regulatory Strategy Document Template

REGULATORY STRATEGY

Product: [Name]
Version: [X.X]
Date: [Date]

1. PRODUCT OVERVIEW
   - Intended use: [Statement]
   - Device classification: [Class I/II/III]
   - Technology: [Description]

2. TARGET MARKETS
   | Market | Priority | Timeline |
   |--------|----------|----------|
   | USA    | 1        | Q1 20XX  |
   | EU     | 2        | Q2 20XX  |

3. REGULATORY PATHWAY
   - FDA: [510(k) / De Novo / PMA]
   - EU: [Class] via [Conformity route]
   - Rationale: [Justification]

4. CLINICAL EVIDENCE STRATEGY
   - Requirements: [Summary]
   - Approach: [Literature / Study / Both]

5. TIMELINE AND MILESTONES
   [Gantt or milestone table]

6. RISKS AND MITIGATION
   | Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
   |------|-------------|--------|------------|

7. RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
   - Budget: $[Amount]
   - Personnel: [FTEs]
   - External support: [Consultants, CRO]

FDA Submission Workflow

Prepare and submit FDA regulatory applications.

Workflow: 510(k) Submission

  1. Confirm 510(k) pathway suitability:
    • Predicate device identified
    • Substantial equivalence supportable
    • No new intended use or technology concerns
  2. Schedule and conduct Pre-Submission (Q-Sub) meeting if needed
  3. Compile submission package:
    • Cover letter and administrative information
    • Device description and intended use
    • Substantial equivalence comparison
    • Performance testing data
    • Biocompatibility (if patient contact)
    • Software documentation (if applicable)
    • Labeling and IFU
  4. Conduct internal review and quality check
  5. Prepare eCopy per FDA format requirements
  6. Submit via FDA ESG portal with user fee payment
  7. Monitor MDUFA clock and respond to AI/RTA requests
  8. Validation: Submission accepted; MDUFA date received; tracking system updated

Workflow: PMA Submission

  1. Confirm PMA pathway:
    • Class III device or no predicate
    • Clinical data strategy defined
  2. Complete IDE clinical study if required:
    • IDE approval
    • Clinical protocol execution
    • Study report completion
  3. Conduct Pre-Submission meeting
  4. Compile PMA submission:
    • Administrative and device information
    • Manufacturing information
    • Nonclinical studies
    • Clinical studies
    • Labeling
  5. Submit original PMA application
  6. Address FDA questions and deficiencies
  7. Prepare for FDA facility inspection
  8. Validation: PMA approved; approval letter received; post-approval requirements documented

FDA Submission Timeline

Milestone 510(k) De Novo PMA
Pre-Sub Meeting Day -90 Day -90 Day -120
Submission Day 0 Day 0 Day 0
RTA Review Day 15 Day 15 Day 45
Substantive Review Days 15-90 Days 15-150 Days 45-180
Decision Day 90 Day 150 Day 180

Common FDA Deficiencies

Category Common Issues Prevention
Substantial Equivalence Weak predicate comparison Strong SE argument upfront
Performance Testing Incomplete test protocols Follow recognized standards
Biocompatibility Missing endpoints ISO 10993 risk assessment
Software Inadequate documentation IEC 62304 compliance
Labeling Inconsistent claims Early labeling review

See: references/fda-submission-guide.md


EU MDR Submission Workflow

Achieve CE marking under EU MDR 2017/745.

Workflow: MDR Technical Documentation

  1. Confirm device classification per MDR Annex VIII
  2. Select conformity assessment route based on class:
    • Class I: Self-declaration
    • Class IIa/IIb: Notified Body involvement
    • Class III: Full NB assessment
  3. Select and engage Notified Body (for Class IIa+)
  4. Compile Technical Documentation per Annex II:
    • Device description and specifications
    • Design and manufacturing information
    • General Safety and Performance Requirements (GSPR) checklist
    • Benefit-risk analysis and risk management
    • Clinical evaluation per Annex XIV
    • Post-market surveillance plan
  5. Establish and document QMS per ISO 13485
  6. Submit application to Notified Body
  7. Address NB questions and coordinate audit
  8. Validation: CE certificate issued; Declaration of Conformity signed; EUDAMED registration complete

MDR Classification Decision Tree

Is the device active?
        │
    Yes─┴─No
     │     │
     ▼     ▼
Is it an   Does it contact
implant?   the body?
  │            │
Yes─┴─No   Yes─┴─No
 │    │     │     │
 ▼    ▼     ▼     ▼
III  IIb  Check   Class I
         contact  (measuring/
         type     sterile if
         and      applicable)
         duration

Clinical Evidence Requirements by Class

Class Clinical Requirement Documentation
I Clinical evaluation (CE) CE report
IIa CE with literature focus CE report + PMCF plan
IIb CE with clinical data CE report + PMCF + clinical study (some)
III CE with clinical investigation CE report + PMCF + clinical investigation

Notified Body Selection Criteria

Criterion Consideration
Scope Device category expertise
Capacity Availability and review timeline
Experience Track record in your technology
Geography Proximity for audits
Cost Fee structure transparency
Communication Responsiveness and clarity

See: references/eu-mdr-submission-guide.md


Global Market Access Workflow

Coordinate regulatory approvals across international markets.

Workflow: Multi-Market Submission Strategy

  1. Define target markets based on business priorities
  2. Sequence markets for efficient evidence leverage:
    • Phase 1: FDA + EU (reference markets)
    • Phase 2: Recognition markets (Canada, Australia)
    • Phase 3: Major markets (Japan, China)
    • Phase 4: Emerging markets
  3. Identify local requirements per market:
    • Clinical data acceptability
    • Local agent/representative needs
    • Language and labeling requirements
  4. Develop master technical file with localization plan
  5. Establish in-country regulatory support
  6. Execute parallel or sequential submissions
  7. Track approvals and coordinate launches
  8. Validation: All target market approvals obtained; registration database updated

Market Priority Matrix

Market Size Complexity Recognition Priority
USA Large High N/A 1
EU Large High N/A 1-2
Canada Medium Medium MDSAP 2
Australia Medium Low EU accepted 2
Japan Large High Local clinical 3
China Large Very High Local testing 3
Brazil Medium High GMP inspection 3-4

Documentation Efficiency Strategy

Document Type Single Source Localization Required
Technical file core Yes Format adaptation
Risk management Yes None
Clinical data Yes Bridging assessment
QMS certificate Yes (ISO 13485) Market-specific audit
Labeling Master label Translation, local requirements
IFU Master content Translation, local symbols

See: references/global-regulatory-pathways.md


Regulatory Intelligence Workflow

Monitor and respond to regulatory changes affecting product portfolio.

Workflow: Regulatory Change Management

  1. Monitor regulatory sources:
    • FDA Federal Register, guidance documents
    • EU Official Journal, MDCG guidance
    • Notified Body communications
    • Industry associations (AdvaMed, MedTech Europe)
  2. Assess relevance to product portfolio
  3. Evaluate impact:
    • Timeline to compliance
    • Resource requirements
    • Product changes needed
  4. Develop compliance action plan
  5. Communicate to affected stakeholders
  6. Implement required changes
  7. Document compliance status
  8. Validation: Compliance action plan approved; changes implemented on schedule

Regulatory Monitoring Sources

Source Type Frequency
FDA Federal Register Regulations, guidance Daily
FDA Device Database 510(k), PMA, recalls Weekly
EU Official Journal MDR/IVDR updates Weekly
MDCG Guidance EU implementation As published
ISO/IEC Standards updates Quarterly
Notified Body Audit findings, trends Per interaction

Impact Assessment Template

REGULATORY CHANGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Change: [Description]
Source: [Regulation/Guidance]
Effective Date: [Date]
Assessment Date: [Date]
Assessed By: [Name]

AFFECTED PRODUCTS
| Product | Impact | Action Required | Timeline |
|---------|--------|-----------------|----------|
| [Name]  | [H/M/L]| [Description]   | [Date]   |

COMPLIANCE ACTIONS
1. [Action 1] - Owner: [Name] - Due: [Date]
2. [Action 2] - Owner: [Name] - Due: [Date]

RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS
- Budget: $[Amount]
- Personnel: [Hours/FTEs]

APPROVAL
Regulatory: _________________ Date: _______
Management: _________________ Date: _______

Decision Frameworks

Pathway Selection Decision Tree

Is predicate device available?
            │
        Yes─┴─No
         │     │
         ▼     ▼
    Is device   Is risk level
    substantially  Low-Moderate?
    equivalent?       │
         │        Yes─┴─No
     Yes─┴─No      │     │
      │     │      ▼     ▼
      ▼     ▼   De Novo  PMA
    510(k)  Consider      required
           De Novo
           or PMA

Pre-Submission Meeting Decision

Factor Schedule Pre-Sub Skip Pre-Sub
Novel Technology ✓
New Intended Use ✓
Complex Testing ✓
Uncertain Predicate ✓
Clinical Data Needed ✓
Well-established ✓
Clear Predicate ✓
Standard Testing ✓

Regulatory Escalation Criteria

Situation Escalation Level Action
Submission rejection VP Regulatory Root cause analysis, strategy revision
Major deficiency Director Cross-functional response team
Timeline at risk Management Resource reallocation review
Regulatory change VP Regulatory Portfolio impact assessment
Safety signal Executive Immediate containment and reporting

Tools and References

Scripts

Tool Purpose Usage
regulatory_tracker.py Track submission status and timelines python regulatory_tracker.py

Regulatory Tracker Features:

  • Track multiple submissions across markets
  • Monitor status and target dates
  • Identify overdue submissions
  • Generate status reports

References

Document Content
fda-submission-guide.md FDA pathways, requirements, review process
eu-mdr-submission-guide.md MDR classification, technical documentation, clinical evidence
global-regulatory-pathways.md Canada, Japan, China, Australia, Brazil requirements
iso-regulatory-requirements.md ISO 13485, 14971, 10993, IEC 62304, 62366 requirements

Key Performance Indicators

KPI Target Calculation
First-time approval rate >85% (Approved without major deficiency / Total submitted) × 100
On-time submission >90% (Submitted by target date / Total submissions) × 100
Review cycle compliance >95% (Responses within deadline / Total requests) × 100
Regulatory hold time <20% (Days on hold / Total review days) × 100

Related Skills

Skill Integration Point
mdr-745-specialist Detailed EU MDR technical requirements
fda-consultant-specialist FDA submission deep expertise
quality-manager-qms-iso13485 QMS for regulatory compliance
risk-management-specialist ISO 14971 risk management