Python Data and State

Overview

Every data bug traces back to an unclear answer to three questions: who owns this data, where is it validated, and how far does it travel? This skill encodes boundary-first thinking — make ownership explicit, validate at the edge, and minimize what crosses a boundary.

Treat these defaults as starting points. When project constraints demand deviation, call out tradeoffs and compensating controls (tests, observability, rollback).

When to Use

• Data ownership is ambiguous or split across modules.
• Validation logic is scattered or duplicated instead of concentrated at ingress.
• Mutable state is shared across module or layer boundaries.
• Multiple modules participate in a single transaction.
• Configuration is stringly-typed, read lazily, or inconsistent across environments.
• Lifecycle of a data object (creation, transformation, persistence) spans unclear boundaries.

When NOT to Use

• Pure algorithmic or computational logic with no shared state.
• Prototypes or throwaway scripts where boundary discipline adds no value.
• UI/presentation-layer styling decisions with no data modeling impact.

Quick Reference

• Make module ownership and invariants explicit.
• Validate at ingress and normalize before domain decisions.
• Share minimal data across boundaries — prefer narrow, typed interfaces.
• Avoid cross-module transactions by default; if unavoidable, isolate coordination logic.
• Keep configuration typed, environment-driven, and startup-validated.

Common Mistakes

• Validating deep inside the call stack — pushing checks into domain logic instead of catching bad data at the boundary where it enters.
• Exposing internal models across module boundaries — sharing ORM objects or rich domain models instead of narrow DTOs or typed dicts.
• Relying on implicit ownership — assuming “whoever wrote it last” owns the data, leading to conflicting mutations and no single source of truth.
• Lazy, untyped config reads — calling os.getenv() at point-of-use with string defaults, so missing or malformed config surfaces as a runtime surprise instead of a startup failure.
• Wrapping unrelated modules in a shared transaction — coupling independent data stores for perceived consistency, creating hidden rollback complexity and contention.

Scope Note

• Treat these recommendations as preferred defaults for common cases, not universal rules.
• If a default conflicts with project constraints or worsens the outcome, suggest a better-fit alternative and explain why it is better for this case.
• When deviating, call out tradeoffs and compensating controls (tests, observability, migration, rollback).

Invocation Notice

• Inform the user when this skill is being invoked by name: python-data-state.

References

• references/data-lifecycle.md
• references/consistency-boundaries.md
• references/configuration.md