prd
npx skills add https://github.com/acedergren/agentic-tools --skill prd
Agent 安装分布
Skill 文档
PRD Skill
Produce comprehensive, drift-proof Product Requirements Documents through iterative discovery.
Output: .claude/reference/PRD.md (the living requirements document for the project).
Mode Routing
Parse $ARGUMENTS to determine the mode:
| Argument | Mode | Description |
|---|---|---|
| (empty) | Create | Interactive PRD creation from scratch |
<feature text> |
Create | Start with context, then iterate |
--update |
Update | Incremental update to existing PRD |
--validate |
Validate | Run validation checklist on existing PRD |
--audit-deps |
Audit | Run dependency/drift analysis only |
--to-plan |
Plan | Generate orchestrate-ready task plan |
Plan Mode (--to-plan)
Transform the PRD’s phasing section into a task plan that /orchestrate can execute directly.
Input
Read .claude/reference/PRD.md. If it doesn’t exist, report error and stop. Validate V5 (DAG) passes first.
Transformation Rules
For each Phase in the PRD:
- Extract requirements mapped to this phase (M1, S1, etc.)
- Generate tasks from each requirement’s acceptance criteria
- Assign waves within each phase:
- Wave 1: Foundation tasks (schemas, types, migrations, config)
- Wave 2: Implementation tasks (routes, services, repositories)
- Wave 3: Integration tasks (wiring, UI, end-to-end flows)
- Wave 4: Polish tasks (error handling, edge cases, docs)
- Assign agent types:
haiku: Type definitions, config changes, simple CRUD, test writingsonnet: Business logic, complex integrations, security-sensitive code
- Set dependencies from the PRD’s phase prerequisites
- Generate verification commands from the PRD’s test file mapping
Output Format
Write to docs/plans/<feature-name>-plan.md:
# Task Plan: [Feature Name]
Generated from PRD: `.claude/reference/PRD.md`
Generated at: [ISO timestamp]
## Phase 1: [Title]
### Wave 1: Foundation
| ID | Task | Agent | Files | Depends | Verify |
| ------ | ------------------------- | ----- | ------------------ | ------- | ---------------- |
| 1-1.01 | Create Zod schemas for M1 | haiku | packages/types/... | â | npx tsc --noEmit |
### Wave 2: Implementation
| ID | Task | Agent | Files | Depends | Verify |
| ------ | --------------------------- | ------ | ----------------- | ------- | --------------------- |
| 1-2.01 | Implement repository for M1 | sonnet | src/repositories/ | 1-1.01 | npx vitest run <test> |
Create Mode
Phase 1: Codebase Scan (automatic)
Before asking questions, build context:
- Launch an Explore agent to map relevant codebase areas
- Read roadmap/changelog for prior decisions
- Check for outdated dependencies in scope
Phase 2: Interactive Discovery (2-4 rounds)
Round 1 â Problem & Vision: What problem, who, success criteria, personas Round 2 â Scope & Boundaries: MoSCoW priorities, out-of-scope, interactions Round 3 â Technical Constraints: Architecture, database, auth, performance Round 4 â Phasing & Risk (if needed): Phases, parallelization, risks
Rules: Never >4 questions. Never ask what the scan answered. Never draft before Round 2.
Phase 3: Draft Generation
- Read
template.mdfrom this skill directory - Write PRD to
.claude/reference/PRD.md - Mark gaps with
[NEEDS CLARIFICATION: ...] - Populate Architecture Decisions with AD-N entries
- Build phasing DAG with explicit dependency arrows
Phase 4: Multi-Angle Validation
Read validation.md and run every check. Present pass/fail results. Iterate until critical gates pass.
Phase 5: Finalize
Remove markers, print summary, commit with docs(prd): add <feature-name> requirements.
Update Mode (--update)
- Read existing PRD
- Ask what changed (new requirement, scope change, dependency update, etc.)
- Launch Explore agent to detect codebase drift
- Generate diff-style updates with
[ADDED],[CHANGED],[REMOVED],[DRIFT DETECTED]markers - Present changes for approval, apply, re-validate
Validate Mode (--validate)
Read validation.md and run all gates. Print pass/fail with line references.
Audit-Deps Mode (--audit-deps)
Read drift-prevention.md and run dependency freshness + architectural drift checks.
Anti-Patterns (NEVER)
- NEVER generate a PRD without scanning the codebase first
- NEVER write acceptance criteria as “should work correctly” â use Given/When/Then
- NEVER skip dependency analysis
- NEVER batch all questions into one wall of text
- NEVER assume a library version â check
package.jsonand npm - NEVER write phasing without dependency arrows (phases must be a DAG)
- NEVER leave
[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]markers in a finalized PRD
Arguments
/prdâ interactive creation/prd Workflow Designerâ start with context/prd --updateâ incremental update/prd --validateâ run validation only/prd --audit-depsâ dependency audit only/prd --to-planâ generate orchestrate-ready task plan