efcore-patterns
npx skills add https://github.com/aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills --skill efcore-patterns
Agent 安装分布
Skill 文档
Entity Framework Core Patterns
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Setting up EF Core in a new project
- Optimizing query performance
- Managing database migrations
- Integrating EF Core with .NET Aspire
- Debugging change tracking issues
- Loading multiple navigation collections efficiently (query splitting)
Core Principles
- NoTracking by Default – Most queries are read-only; opt-in to tracking
- Never Edit Migrations Manually – Always use CLI commands
- Dedicated Migration Service – Separate migration execution from application startup
- ExecutionStrategy for Retries – Handle transient database failures
- Explicit Updates – When NoTracking, explicitly mark entities for update
Pattern 1: NoTracking by Default
Configure your DbContext to disable change tracking by default. This improves performance for read-heavy workloads.
public class ApplicationDbContext : DbContext
{
public ApplicationDbContext(DbContextOptions<ApplicationDbContext> options)
: base(options)
{
// Disable change tracking by default for better performance on read-only queries
// Use .AsTracking() explicitly for queries that need to track changes
ChangeTracker.QueryTrackingBehavior = QueryTrackingBehavior.NoTracking;
}
public DbSet<Order> Orders => Set<Order>();
public DbSet<Customer> Customers => Set<Customer>();
}
When NoTracking is Active
Read-only queries work normally:
// â
Fast read - no tracking overhead
var orders = await dbContext.Orders
.Where(o => o.Status == OrderStatus.Pending)
.ToListAsync();
Writes require explicit handling:
// â WRONG - Entity not tracked, SaveChanges does nothing
var order = await dbContext.Orders.FirstOrDefaultAsync(o => o.Id == orderId);
order.Status = OrderStatus.Shipped;
await dbContext.SaveChangesAsync(); // Nothing happens!
// â
CORRECT - Explicitly mark entity for update
var order = await dbContext.Orders.FirstOrDefaultAsync(o => o.Id == orderId);
order.Status = OrderStatus.Shipped;
dbContext.Orders.Update(order); // Marks entire entity as modified
await dbContext.SaveChangesAsync();
// â
ALSO CORRECT - Use AsTracking() for the query
var order = await dbContext.Orders
.AsTracking()
.FirstOrDefaultAsync(o => o.Id == orderId);
order.Status = OrderStatus.Shipped;
await dbContext.SaveChangesAsync(); // Works!
When to Use Tracking
| Scenario | Use Tracking? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Display data in UI | No | Read-only, no updates |
| API GET endpoints | No | Returning data, no mutations |
| Update single entity | Yes or explicit Update() | Need to save changes |
| Complex update with navigation | Yes | Tracking handles relationships |
| Batch operations | No + ExecuteUpdate | More efficient |
Explicit Add/Update Pattern
public class OrderService
{
private readonly ApplicationDbContext _db;
// CREATE - Always use Add (works regardless of tracking)
public async Task<Order> CreateOrderAsync(Order order)
{
_db.Orders.Add(order);
await _db.SaveChangesAsync();
return order;
}
// UPDATE - Explicitly mark as modified
public async Task UpdateOrderStatusAsync(Guid orderId, OrderStatus newStatus)
{
var order = await _db.Orders.FirstOrDefaultAsync(o => o.Id == orderId)
?? throw new NotFoundException($"Order {orderId} not found");
order.Status = newStatus;
order.UpdatedAt = DateTimeOffset.UtcNow;
// Explicitly mark as modified since DbContext uses NoTracking by default
_db.Orders.Update(order);
await _db.SaveChangesAsync();
}
// DELETE - Attach and remove
public async Task DeleteOrderAsync(Guid orderId)
{
var order = new Order { Id = orderId };
_db.Orders.Remove(order);
await _db.SaveChangesAsync();
}
}
Pattern 2: Never Edit Migrations Manually
CRITICAL: Always use EF Core CLI commands to manage migrations. Never:
- Manually edit migration files (except for custom SQL in
Up()/Down()) - Delete migration files directly
- Rename migration files
- Copy migrations between projects
Creating Migrations
# Create a new migration
dotnet ef migrations add AddCustomerTable \
--project src/MyApp.Infrastructure \
--startup-project src/MyApp.Api
# With a specific DbContext (if you have multiple)
dotnet ef migrations add AddCustomerTable \
--context ApplicationDbContext \
--project src/MyApp.Infrastructure \
--startup-project src/MyApp.Api
Removing Migrations
# Remove the last migration (if not yet applied)
dotnet ef migrations remove \
--project src/MyApp.Infrastructure \
--startup-project src/MyApp.Api
# NEVER do this:
# rm Migrations/20240101_AddCustomerTable.cs # â BAD!
Applying Migrations
# Apply all pending migrations
dotnet ef database update \
--project src/MyApp.Infrastructure \
--startup-project src/MyApp.Api
# Apply to a specific migration
dotnet ef database update AddCustomerTable \
--project src/MyApp.Infrastructure \
--startup-project src/MyApp.Api
# Rollback to a previous migration
dotnet ef database update PreviousMigrationName \
--project src/MyApp.Infrastructure \
--startup-project src/MyApp.Api
Generating SQL Scripts
# Generate SQL script for all migrations
dotnet ef migrations script \
--project src/MyApp.Infrastructure \
--startup-project src/MyApp.Api \
--output migrations.sql
# Generate idempotent script (safe to run multiple times)
dotnet ef migrations script \
--idempotent \
--project src/MyApp.Infrastructure \
--startup-project src/MyApp.Api
Pattern 3: Dedicated Migration Service with Aspire
Separate migration execution from your main application using a dedicated migration service. This ensures:
- Migrations complete before the app starts
- Clean separation of concerns
- Controlled seeding in test environments
Project Structure
src/
âââ MyApp.AppHost/ # Aspire orchestration
âââ MyApp.Api/ # Main application
âââ MyApp.Infrastructure/ # DbContext and migrations
âââ MyApp.MigrationService/ # Dedicated migration runner
MigrationService Program.cs
using MyApp.Infrastructure.Data;
using MyApp.MigrationService;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
var builder = Host.CreateApplicationBuilder(args);
// Add Aspire service defaults
builder.AddServiceDefaults();
// Add PostgreSQL DbContext
var connectionString = builder.Configuration.GetConnectionString("appdb")
?? throw new InvalidOperationException("Connection string 'appdb' not found.");
builder.Services.AddDbContext<ApplicationDbContext>(options =>
options.UseNpgsql(connectionString, npgsqlOptions =>
npgsqlOptions.MigrationsAssembly("MyApp.Infrastructure")));
// Add the migration worker
builder.Services.AddHostedService<MigrationWorker>();
var host = builder.Build();
host.Run();
MigrationWorker.cs
public class MigrationWorker : BackgroundService
{
private readonly IServiceProvider _serviceProvider;
private readonly IHostApplicationLifetime _hostApplicationLifetime;
private readonly ILogger<MigrationWorker> _logger;
public MigrationWorker(
IServiceProvider serviceProvider,
IHostApplicationLifetime hostApplicationLifetime,
ILogger<MigrationWorker> logger)
{
_serviceProvider = serviceProvider;
_hostApplicationLifetime = hostApplicationLifetime;
_logger = logger;
}
protected override async Task ExecuteAsync(CancellationToken stoppingToken)
{
_logger.LogInformation("Migration service starting...");
try
{
using var scope = _serviceProvider.CreateScope();
var dbContext = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<ApplicationDbContext>();
await RunMigrationsAsync(dbContext, stoppingToken);
_logger.LogInformation("Migration service completed successfully.");
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
_logger.LogError(ex, "Migration service failed: {Error}", ex.Message);
throw;
}
finally
{
// Stop the application after migrations complete
_hostApplicationLifetime.StopApplication();
}
}
private async Task RunMigrationsAsync(ApplicationDbContext dbContext, CancellationToken ct)
{
// Use execution strategy for transient failure handling
var strategy = dbContext.Database.CreateExecutionStrategy();
await strategy.ExecuteAsync(async () =>
{
var pendingMigrations = await dbContext.Database.GetPendingMigrationsAsync(ct);
if (pendingMigrations.Any())
{
_logger.LogInformation("Applying {Count} pending migrations...",
pendingMigrations.Count());
await dbContext.Database.MigrateAsync(ct);
_logger.LogInformation("Migrations applied successfully.");
}
else
{
_logger.LogInformation("No pending migrations. Database is up to date.");
}
});
}
}
AppHost Configuration
var builder = DistributedApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
var postgres = builder.AddPostgres("postgres");
var db = postgres.AddDatabase("appdb");
// Migrations run first, then exit
var migrations = builder.AddProject<Projects.MyApp_MigrationService>("migrations")
.WaitFor(db)
.WithReference(db);
// API waits for migrations to complete
var api = builder.AddProject<Projects.MyApp_Api>("api")
.WaitForCompletion(migrations) // Key: waits for migrations to finish
.WithReference(db);
Pattern 4: ExecutionStrategy for Transient Failures
Always use CreateExecutionStrategy() for operations that might fail transiently:
public async Task UpdateWithRetryAsync(Guid id, Action<Order> update)
{
var strategy = _dbContext.Database.CreateExecutionStrategy();
await strategy.ExecuteAsync(async () =>
{
var order = await _dbContext.Orders
.AsTracking()
.FirstOrDefaultAsync(o => o.Id == id);
if (order is null) return;
update(order);
await _dbContext.SaveChangesAsync();
});
}
Important: You cannot use CreateExecutionStrategy() with user-initiated transactions. If you need transactions with retry:
var strategy = _dbContext.Database.CreateExecutionStrategy();
await strategy.ExecuteAsync(async () =>
{
// Transaction must be INSIDE the strategy callback
await using var transaction = await _dbContext.Database.BeginTransactionAsync();
try
{
// ... your operations ...
await _dbContext.SaveChangesAsync();
await transaction.CommitAsync();
}
catch
{
await transaction.RollbackAsync();
throw;
}
});
Pattern 5: Bulk Operations with ExecuteUpdate/ExecuteDelete
For bulk operations, use EF Core 7+ ExecuteUpdateAsync and ExecuteDeleteAsync instead of loading entities:
// â SLOW - Loads all entities into memory
var expiredOrders = await _db.Orders
.Where(o => o.ExpiresAt < DateTimeOffset.UtcNow)
.ToListAsync();
foreach (var order in expiredOrders)
{
order.Status = OrderStatus.Expired;
}
await _db.SaveChangesAsync();
// â
FAST - Single SQL UPDATE statement
await _db.Orders
.Where(o => o.ExpiresAt < DateTimeOffset.UtcNow)
.ExecuteUpdateAsync(setters => setters
.SetProperty(o => o.Status, OrderStatus.Expired)
.SetProperty(o => o.UpdatedAt, DateTimeOffset.UtcNow));
// â
FAST - Single SQL DELETE statement
await _db.Orders
.Where(o => o.Status == OrderStatus.Cancelled && o.CreatedAt < cutoffDate)
.ExecuteDeleteAsync();
Common Pitfalls
1. Forgetting to Update When NoTracking
// â Silent failure - entity not tracked
var customer = await _db.Customers.FindAsync(id);
customer.Name = "New Name";
await _db.SaveChangesAsync(); // Does nothing!
// â
Explicit update
var customer = await _db.Customers.FindAsync(id);
customer.Name = "New Name";
_db.Customers.Update(customer);
await _db.SaveChangesAsync();
2. N+1 Query Problem
// â N+1 queries - one query per order
var customers = await _db.Customers.ToListAsync();
foreach (var customer in customers)
{
var orders = customer.Orders; // Lazy load triggers query
}
// â
Eager loading - single query
var customers = await _db.Customers
.Include(c => c.Orders)
.ToListAsync();
3. Tracking Conflicts with Multiple DbContext Instances
// â Tracking conflict - entity tracked by different context
var order1 = await _db1.Orders.AsTracking().FindAsync(id);
var order2 = await _db2.Orders.AsTracking().FindAsync(id);
order2.Status = OrderStatus.Shipped;
await _db2.SaveChangesAsync(); // May throw or behave unexpectedly
// â
Use single context or detach first
_db1.Entry(order1).State = EntityState.Detached;
4. Not Using Async Consistently
// â Blocking call in async context
var orders = _db.Orders.ToList(); // Blocks thread
// â
Async all the way
var orders = await _db.Orders.ToListAsync();
5. Querying Inside Loops
// â Query per iteration
foreach (var orderId in orderIds)
{
var order = await _db.Orders.FindAsync(orderId);
// process order
}
// â
Single query
var orders = await _db.Orders
.Where(o => orderIds.Contains(o.Id))
.ToListAsync();
DbContext Lifetime in DI
ASP.NET Core (Scoped by Default)
// Scoped = one instance per HTTP request
builder.Services.AddDbContext<ApplicationDbContext>(options =>
options.UseNpgsql(connectionString));
Background Services (Create Scope)
public class MyBackgroundService : BackgroundService
{
private readonly IServiceProvider _serviceProvider;
protected override async Task ExecuteAsync(CancellationToken stoppingToken)
{
// â
Create scope for each unit of work
using var scope = _serviceProvider.CreateScope();
var dbContext = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<ApplicationDbContext>();
// ... use dbContext ...
}
}
Actors / Long-Lived Objects (Factory Pattern)
public class OrderActor : ReceiveActor
{
private readonly IDbContextFactory<ApplicationDbContext> _dbFactory;
public OrderActor(IDbContextFactory<ApplicationDbContext> dbFactory)
{
_dbFactory = dbFactory;
ReceiveAsync<GetOrder>(async msg =>
{
// Create fresh context for each operation
await using var db = await _dbFactory.CreateDbContextAsync();
var order = await db.Orders.FindAsync(msg.OrderId);
Sender.Tell(order);
});
}
}
// Registration
builder.Services.AddDbContextFactory<ApplicationDbContext>(options =>
options.UseNpgsql(connectionString));
Pattern 6: Query Splitting to Prevent Cartesian Explosion
When you load multiple navigation collections via Include(), EF Core generates a single query that can cause cartesian explosion. If you have 10 orders with 10 items each, you get 100 rows instead of 10 + 10.
Global Configuration (Recommended for Most Cases)
Enable query splitting globally in your DbContext configuration:
services.AddDbContext<ApplicationDbContext>(options =>
options.UseNpgsql(connectionString, npgsqlOptions =>
{
npgsqlOptions.UseQuerySplittingBehavior(QuerySplittingBehavior.SplitQuery);
}));
Per-Query Override
Use single query when you know it’s more efficient:
// Use single query when you know the structure is well-understood
var orders = await dbContext.Orders
.Include(o => o.Items)
.Include(o => o.Payments)
.AsSingleQuery() // Override global split behavior
.ToListAsync();
Trade-offs
| Behavior | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| SplitQuery | No cartesian explosion, better for large collections | Multiple round-trips, potential consistency issues |
| SingleQuery | Single round-trip, transactional consistency | Cartesian explosion with multiple collections |
Recommendation: Default to SplitQuery globally, override with AsSingleQuery() for specific queries where single-query is known to be better.
When to Prefer SingleQuery
- Small, well-understood navigation graphs (2-3 levels)
- Queries where all related data is always needed
- Performance-critical paths where round-trip cost is lower than cartesian explosion
When to Prefer SplitQuery
- Large or unpredictable navigation graphs
- Many-to-many relationships
- Queries loading collections that may not all be needed
Testing with EF Core
In-Memory Provider (Unit Tests Only)
// Only for simple unit tests - doesn't match real database behavior
var options = new DbContextOptionsBuilder<ApplicationDbContext>()
.UseInMemoryDatabase(databaseName: Guid.NewGuid().ToString())
.Options;
using var context = new ApplicationDbContext(options);
Real Database with TestContainers (Integration Tests)
See the testcontainers-integration-tests skill for proper database testing.
// Use real PostgreSQL in container
var container = new PostgreSqlBuilder()
.WithImage("postgres:16-alpine")
.Build();
await container.StartAsync();
var options = new DbContextOptionsBuilder<ApplicationDbContext>()
.UseNpgsql(container.GetConnectionString())
.Options;